Peranan Tiga Pilar dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Tenurial di Taman Wisata Alam Ruteng, Flores, Nusa Tenggara Timur

Abstract

Manggarai communities has been in and around the area of Ruteng Recreation Parksince before the establishment. The determination of the area for conservation cause tenure conflictsfor the closure region for access to agricultural and the timber. The conflict resolution involves three elements, namely the government, customs and religion are called the three pillars. This study aims to understand the stages of the conflict tenure in Manggarai, relevant stakeholders and the role of the three pillars in conflict resolution. The study was conducted in four villages with village conflicting criteria and do not conflict in April to May 2016. Acquisition of data using observation, in-depth interviews with a purposive and snowball and secondary data. Analysis of data using analysis of tree conflicts, stakeholders and conflict mapping. The results showed that the cause of the conflict which is the difference value systems which have implications for the disagreement land status and boundaries as well as the uncertainty of access due to rights issues and access. Ruteng Recreation Park area assignment is not determined by the collective perception that lack of support of the parties. Ruteng Recreation Parksetting legislation and its implementation does not guarantee the security of rights and indigenous peoples' access due to constraints of knowledge and understanding of the laws and regulations, resource constraints, regulatory and administrative development issues. The concept of the three pillars was not optimal because it has not reduced the rate of destruction of Ruteng Recreation Park and there were still conflict of encroachment and illegal logging.

Customary Forest Managements and Its Challenges in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: An Implication of Constitutional Court Decision 2012

“…The ENT Province has no concessions and another land utilization hindering building recognition of customary forests (Myers et al, 2017). Therefore, the contestation commonly comes between conservation areas (Iswandono et al, 2015;Kriswoyo et al, 2019) or between other family clans (Sopian, 2015).…”

Analysis of Tenurial Conflict of the Bunaken National Park (A Case Study of Mantehage Island)

“…Masyarakat mengklaim bahwa areal perkebunan yang berada pada kawasaan TN Bunaken merupakan hak mereka karena telah dikelola dan dimanfaatkan menjadi lahan pertanian atau perkebunan sejak lama. Secara umum adanya klaim lahan kawasan hutan negara oleh masyarakat yang digunakan sebagai lahan bercocok tanam didasarkan pada untuk memenuhi kebutuhan hidup serta tuntutan atas hak kepastian hukum atas lahan mereka (Irawan et al, 2016;Kriswoyo et al, 2019).…”

Analysis of Tenurial Conflict of the Bunaken National Park (A Case Study of Mantehage Island)

“…Perbedaan pandangan antara PTB Kawasan Hutan Kabupaten Minahasa Utara dengan masyarakat Desa Mantehage (Buhias), Desa Mantehage I (Bango) dan Desa Mantehage III (Tinongko) terhadap penguasaan, pengelolaan, pemanfaatan, dan penggunaan kawasan TN Bunaken di Pulau Mantehage menyebabkan proses penataan batasnya belum dapat dilaksanakan Masyarakat mengklaim bahwa areal perkebunan yang berada pada kawasaan TN Bunaken merupakan hak mereka karena telah dikelola dan dimanfaatkan menjadi lahan pertanian atau perkebunan sejak lama. Secara umum adanya klaim lahan kawasan hutan negara oleh masyarakat yang digunakan sebagai lahan bercocok tanam didasarkan pada untuk memenuhi kebutuhan hidup serta tuntutan atas hak kepastian hukum atas lahan mereka (Irawan et al, 2016;Kriswoyo et al, 2019).…”