Purpose: The objectives of this work were (i) to screen ocular hypotensive prostaglandin (PGF2α) analogsbimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost as well as their free acid forms-for interaction with effl ux pumps on the cornea and (ii) to assess the modulation of effl ux upon co-administration of these prostaglandin analogs. Methods: Cultured rabbit primary corneal epithelial cells (rPCEC) were employed as an in vitro model for rabbit cornea. Transporter-specifi c interaction studies were carried out using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells overexpressing MDR1, MRP1, MRP2, MRP5, and BCRP. Freshly excised rabbit cornea was used as an ex vivo model to determine transcorneal permeability. Results: Cellular accumulation studies clearly showed that all prostaglandin analogs and their free acid forms are substrates of MRP1, MRP2, and MRP5. Bimatoprost was the only prostaglandin analog in this study to interact with P-gp. In addition, none of these molecules showed any affi nity for BCRP. K i values of these prostaglandin analogs obtained from dose-dependent inhibition of erythromycin effl ux in rPCEC showed bimatoprost (82.54 μM) and travoprost (94.77 μM) to have similar but higher affi nity to effl ux pumps than latanoprost (163.20 μM). Ex vivo studies showed that the permeation of these molecules across cornea was signifi cantly elevated in the presence of specifi c effl ux modulators. Finally, both in vitro and ex vivo experiments demonstrated that the effl ux of these prostaglandin analogs could be modulated by co-administering them together. Conclusion: Bimatoprost, latanoprost, travoprost, and their free acid forms are substrates of multiple drug effl ux pumps on the cornea. Co-administration of these molecules together is a viable strategy to overcome effl ux, which could simultaneously elicit a synergistic pharmacological effect, since these molecules have been shown to activate different receptor population for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP).