2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pepper EST database: comprehensive in silico tool for analyzing the chili pepper (Capsicum annuum) transcriptome

Abstract: Background: There is no dedicated database available for Expressed Sequence Tags (EST) of the chili pepper (Capsicum annuum), although the interest in a chili pepper EST database is increasing internationally due to the nutritional, economic, and pharmaceutical value of the plant. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing of the ESTs of chili pepper cv. Bukang have produced hundreds of thousands of complementary DNA (cDNA) sequences. Therefore, a chili pepper EST database was designed and constructed to en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, SNPs can be identified by simply comparing a candidate sequence to a reference sequence (Nicolai et al, 2012), by whole genome sequencing (WGS; Goff et al, 2002;The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000), or by sequence alignment of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) to a reference sequence (Jones, 2009;Kota et al, 2001;Labate and Baldo, 2005). For the crops like hot pepper, in which the genome is huge, ESTs have been adopted as an alternative to WGS and as a substrate for cDNA array-based expression analyses (Kim et al, 2008;Rudd, 2003). ESTs are a few hundred base pairs of sequence derived from randomly selected cDNA clones prepared from specific tissues, and EST sequencing is inexpensive compared to WGS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, SNPs can be identified by simply comparing a candidate sequence to a reference sequence (Nicolai et al, 2012), by whole genome sequencing (WGS; Goff et al, 2002;The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000), or by sequence alignment of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) to a reference sequence (Jones, 2009;Kota et al, 2001;Labate and Baldo, 2005). For the crops like hot pepper, in which the genome is huge, ESTs have been adopted as an alternative to WGS and as a substrate for cDNA array-based expression analyses (Kim et al, 2008;Rudd, 2003). ESTs are a few hundred base pairs of sequence derived from randomly selected cDNA clones prepared from specific tissues, and EST sequencing is inexpensive compared to WGS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example of such a scenario in count data is detection of differentially expressed genes, where even subtle changes in gene expression levels can be indicators of biologically crucial processes [1]. When replicas are costly to obtain one can attempt to use the limited data at one's disposal to make the relevant inferences, as for example in the Audic and Claverie approach [2][3][4][5][6]. Another situation where available count data can be extremely sparse is estimation of time delay in non-stationary gravitationally lensed photon streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a model-based Bayesian approach that averages over possible Poisson models with weighting determined by the posterior over the models, given the single observation. In fact, such a Bayesian approach has been considered in the bioinformatics literature under the assumption of flat improper prior over the Poisson rate parameter [2][3][4][5][6]. One can, of course, be excused for being highly sceptical about the relevance of such inferences, yet the methodology has apparently been used in a number of successful studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand fruit development and ripening mechanisms, numerous studies have focused on measuring transcript and metabolite levels in climacteric fruits, such as tomato (Alba et al, 2005;Vriezen et al, 2008;Enfissi et al, 2010;Karlova et al, 2011;Osorio et al, 2011a) and peach (Borsani et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2010;Lombardo et al, 2011;Li et al, 2012), and in nonclimacteric fruits, such as strawberry (Aharoni and O'Connell, 2002;Fait et al, 2008;Bombarely et al, 2010;Osorio et al, 2011b;Zhang et al, 2011), pepper (Kim et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2010;Osorio et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013;Wahyuni et al, 2013), and grape Grimplet et al, 2007). These studies have been complemented by the investigation of transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data in the three dominant ripening mutants of tomato, ripening-inhibitor (rin), nonripening (nor), and never-ripe (Nr), along the developmental and ripening periods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%