2014
DOI: 10.7235/hort.2014.14109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker Discovery from Transcriptome Sequencing for Marker-assisted Backcrossing in Capsicum

Abstract: Backcross breeding is the method most commonly used to introgress new traits into elite lines. Conventional backcross breeding requires at least 4-5 generations to recover the genomic background of the recurrent parent. Marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) represents a new breeding approach that can substantially reduce breeding time and cost. For successful MABC, highly polymorphic markers with known positions in each chromosome are essential. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers have many advantages o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used 96 alleles to survey genetic diversity. The cost of genotyping of large germplasm collection is relatively expensive, therefore based on our preliminary studies with 412 SNPs [19], 48 SNPs with high PIC values were used for diversity study. Even though most of the SNP makers used in this study had high PIC values close to 0.5, SNP markers are less powerful than SSR markers in terms of relative kinship estimation and population structure analysis [4244] because SSR markers have higher allelic diversity than SNP markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we used 96 alleles to survey genetic diversity. The cost of genotyping of large germplasm collection is relatively expensive, therefore based on our preliminary studies with 412 SNPs [19], 48 SNPs with high PIC values were used for diversity study. Even though most of the SNP makers used in this study had high PIC values close to 0.5, SNP markers are less powerful than SSR markers in terms of relative kinship estimation and population structure analysis [4244] because SSR markers have higher allelic diversity than SNP markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of 48 SNP markers evenly distributed in 12 pepper chromosomes were used in this study [19] (Additional file 1: Table S1). In a preliminary study a total of 282 accessions were randomly selected from entire germplasm collection for genetic diversity study with 412 SNP markers developed by Kang et al [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expression patterns of PLPK genes from various pepper genotypes were analysed using RNA-seq data from previous research [ 48 ]. The sequence reads were mapped to the pepper transcriptome database ( http://cab.pepper.snu.ac.kr ) with CLC Genomics Workbench v8.0 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) with default parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragments were sequenced and SNP positions were selected based on the variable genotypic differences in single nucleotides. DNA fragments bearing more than 60 nucleotides coupled with at least three diallelic SNP positions were selected as SNP markers [19]. A nanofluidic genotyping system was deployed for evaluating and validating the selected putative SNP markers for their suitability in identifying heterozygous onion cultivars.…”
Section: Mining and Validation Of Putative Snpsmentioning
confidence: 99%