2012
DOI: 10.1021/pr200874e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pepitome: Evaluating Improved Spectral Library Search for Identification Complementarity and Quality Assessment

Abstract: Spectral libraries have emerged as a viable alternative to protein sequence databases for peptide identification. These libraries contain previously detected peptide sequences and their corresponding tandem mass spectra (MS/MS). Search engines can then identify peptides by comparing experimental MS/MS scans to those in the library. Many of these algorithms employ the dot product score for measuring the quality of a spectrum-spectrum match (SSM). This scoring system does not offer a clear statistical interpreta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mzml files were searched using MyriMatch version 2.1.132 (33), Pepitome version 1.0.42 (34), Comet version 2014.01.1 (35), and MS-GFϩ version 9517 (36) against the human Refseq version 54 database (Sep 25, 2012; 34,590 entries). A semitryptic search was employed with a maximum of four missed cleavages allowed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mzml files were searched using MyriMatch version 2.1.132 (33), Pepitome version 1.0.42 (34), Comet version 2014.01.1 (35), and MS-GFϩ version 9517 (36) against the human Refseq version 54 database (Sep 25, 2012; 34,590 entries). A semitryptic search was employed with a maximum of four missed cleavages allowed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other programs, such as SpectraST (21) and Pepitome (22), utilize a spectral library composed of experimentally identified and validated MS/MS spectra. These methods use a variety of scoring algorithms to rank potential peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) and select the top hit as a putative PSM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shotgun proteomics has a number of advantages: not using 2-DE; analyses of basic proteins; analysis of high molecular weight proteins (>120 kDa); and detection of low abundance proteins [28]. Dasari et al [29] developed Pepitome, a new spectral library search tool, for the identification of peptides by comparing experimental MS/MS scans to those in spectral libraries. This tool makes the automation of quality analysis and quality control for shotgun proteomics data possible [29].…”
Section: Discovery and Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dasari et al [29] developed Pepitome, a new spectral library search tool, for the identification of peptides by comparing experimental MS/MS scans to those in spectral libraries. This tool makes the automation of quality analysis and quality control for shotgun proteomics data possible [29]. Despite the advances such as high-throughput, high sensitivity and precision, these methods have some disadvantages.…”
Section: Discovery and Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%