2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4155116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

People from the US and China Think about Their Personal and Collective Future Differently

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A latent variable was created for the future infection rate prediction, integrating four questions requesting an estimate of the percentage of the population that will be infected in the future in local community, Ontario, Canada, and World. This combination was a valid approach considering two things: (1) the lack of a positivity bias for personal over collective future prediction in this sample, similar to previous findings with Chinese samples [ 15 , 16 ]; (2) all four items loaded (standardized values ranged from 0.801 to 0.965) well above the recommended value of 0.40 [ 17 ], supporting the appropriateness of a single latent variable for future infection prediction [ 18 , 19 ]. Additionally, all four variables showed consistent positive correlations ( rs = 0.636–0.888, ps < 0.001).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A latent variable was created for the future infection rate prediction, integrating four questions requesting an estimate of the percentage of the population that will be infected in the future in local community, Ontario, Canada, and World. This combination was a valid approach considering two things: (1) the lack of a positivity bias for personal over collective future prediction in this sample, similar to previous findings with Chinese samples [ 15 , 16 ]; (2) all four items loaded (standardized values ranged from 0.801 to 0.965) well above the recommended value of 0.40 [ 17 ], supporting the appropriateness of a single latent variable for future infection prediction [ 18 , 19 ]. Additionally, all four variables showed consistent positive correlations ( rs = 0.636–0.888, ps < 0.001).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is consistent with the finding that people routinely remember negative events for the collective past (Liu et al 2005; see also Cyr and Hirst 2019), but contrasts with the fact that they remember mostly positive events for the personal past (Kahneman et al 2009). Another study obtained somewhat different results with Chinese students, who showed roughly equal rates of positivity for the past and the future (Deng et al 2022). We look forward to future research that will explore similarities and differences in individual and collective remembering and future thinking across nations and cultures.…”
Section: Collective Future Thinking and Mental Time Travelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Cross-cultural psychology (e.g., Markus & Kitayama, 1991) suggests that positivity biases in general are less prevalent in non-Western societies. Little research has explicitly examined cultural variability in intertemporal representations and implicit trajectories concerning the self across cultures (however, see Deng et al, 2022, for some suggestive early work in Chinese and American samples). Until such programmatic work has progressed further, we suggest remaining cognizant of the possibility that the effects reported are culturally bound, particularly since the content and general structure of at least one component of personal temporal thought, autobiographical memory, varies considerably between cultures (Wang, 2004(Wang, , 2016.…”
Section: Age Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with personal temporal thought, we advise caution in universalizing these findings, given that little research in collective temporal thought has been done in non-Western populations. Some early findings in Chinese and Turkish samples suggest collective temporal thought may indeed be culturally variable, although negativity biases do seem common (Deng et al, 2022;Hacibektasoglu et al, 2022;Mert et al, 2022). Living historical memories in Western countries tends to be more negative than in developing countries (Choi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Collective Temporal Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%