1968
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(68)90037-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
8

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
100
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…23 The outcome of the current study appears to support Nakabayashi's proposal 24,25,26 that exposure of enamel crystallites (ie surface roughening) is more important than welldefined etch patterns. These workers suggested that the resin-enamel bond strength is the result of the cumulative crosssectional area of resin infiltrating the enamel space.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…23 The outcome of the current study appears to support Nakabayashi's proposal 24,25,26 that exposure of enamel crystallites (ie surface roughening) is more important than welldefined etch patterns. These workers suggested that the resin-enamel bond strength is the result of the cumulative crosssectional area of resin infiltrating the enamel space.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The degree of surface roughness produced by phosphoric acid is greater than that obtained with the self-etch primer or maleic acid because of its lower pH. This increased surface roughness may possibly provide higher bond strength because the bonding of a resin composite to enamel is mainly based on micromechanical retention [100]. From a clinical point of view, it is almost impossible to prevent an accidental contact of etched enamel with maleic acid or a self-etch primer.…”
Section: The Effect Of Prior Enamel Etching With Phosphoric Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After polymerization of the bonding agent, a durable attachment to the enamel surface is achieved by micromechanical interlocking. 6 The formation of tag-like resin extensions into interprismatic and intercrystallite enamel microporosities has been considered as the predominant mechanism of bonding resin composites to phosphoric acid-etched enamel. [6][7] The bond strength of resin composites to acid-etched enamel is typically in the range of 20-25 Mpa and provides routinely successful retention of resin composites for a variety of clinical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The formation of tag-like resin extensions into interprismatic and intercrystallite enamel microporosities has been considered as the predominant mechanism of bonding resin composites to phosphoric acid-etched enamel. [6][7] The bond strength of resin composites to acid-etched enamel is typically in the range of 20-25 Mpa and provides routinely successful retention of resin composites for a variety of clinical applications. 8 Enamel pre-treatment could be simplified by the use of self-etching and all-in-one adhesive systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%