Penetration of Diesel Exhaust Particles Through Commercially Available Dust Half Masks

Abstract

Half masks are certified by the competent, national institutions--National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the USA and the respective European national institutions applying common European regulations. However, certification testing is conducted with particles of NaCl, paraffin oil, or dioctyl phthalate (DOP) and at the constant flow rate, whereas particles commonly found in workplaces may differ in size, shape, and morphology from these particles. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate filtration efficiency of commercially available filtering facepiece half masks under the condition of exposure to diesel fumes. In this study, we focused on the particulate phase [diesel exhaust particles (DEP)] of three (petroleum diesel, ecodiesel, and biodiesel) diesel fuel combustion types. Two types of European standard-certified half masks, FFP2 and FFP - Filtering Facepiece, and three types of popular diesel fuels were tested. The study showed that the filtration efficiencies for each examined half mask and for each of diesel exhaust fumes were lower than the minimum filtration efficiency required for the standard test aerosols by the European standards. For FFP2 and FFP3 particulate half masks, standard minimum filtration efficiency is 94 and 99%, respectively, whereas 84-89% of mass of DEP from various fuels were filtered by the tested FFP2 and only 75-86% by the FFP3. The study indicated that DEP is more penetrating for these filters than the standard salt or paraffin oil test aerosols. The study also showed that the most penetrating DEP are probably in the 30- to 300-nm size range, regardless of the fuel type and the half-mask model. Finally, the pressure drops across both half masks during the 80-min tests remained below an acceptable maximum of breathing resistance-regardless of the fuel types. The respiratory system, during 40-min test exposures, may be exposed to 12-16mg of DEP if a FFP2 or FFP3 particulate half mask is used. To conclude, commercially available half masks may not ensure a sufficient level of protection of the respiratory tract against diesel exhaust fumes.

Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution

“…A study of the filtration efficiency of masks mounted on a mannequin head with mask sealed to the head found penetration of diesel aerosol mass between 11% and 15% for FFP2 masks and 13%–24% for FFP3 masks. 11 These studies, however, did not account for inward leakage around the seal between the mask and face on humans.…”

Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects

“…N95 FFRs have been widely studied for filtration efficiency [ 11 , 12 ], face seal leakage [ 12 , 13 ], fit factors [ 14 , 15 ], and protection factors [ 6 , 10 ]. With respect to EN-specified FFP respirators, only the filtration efficiency was studied [ 16 ].…”

Reducing particulate emissions by using advanced engine oil nanoadditives based on molybdenum disulfide and carbon nanotubes

“…First, 400 ml of the suspension was dispersed using an ultrasonic homogenizer for 45 min in a cooling bath. Measurements were performed using fast aerosol particle emission spectrometry—FAPES (Grimm Aerosol Technic GmbH system, Germany) 21 . The exhaust gases were produced using a 5.5 kW EM 5500CX Honda (Japan) power generator for generating 230 V and 12 V alternating current.…”