Penetration of bioceramic and epoxy-resin endodontic cements into lateral canals

Candeiro, George Táccio de Miranda; Lavor, Amanda Bezerra; Lima, Ilana Thaís de Freitas; Vasconcelos, Bruno Carvalho de; Gomes, Nilton Vivacqua; Iglecias, Elaine Faga; Gavini, Giulio

doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0049

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, most of the studies that evaluated root canal filling used root canals of extracted human teeth, whereas in the present study it was used simulated canals in blocks of acrylic resin [28][29][30]. Although the artificial canals do not reproduce the characteristics of root dentin, there is a great difficulty in obtaining human teeth with similar conditions for comparison [36]. Therefore, laboratory studies with acrylic blocks and simulated canals are commonly used, which ensure a control of experimental conditions, allowing only the variables of interest to be analyzed [37,38].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Flow, Filling Ability and Apical Extrusion of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study

Torres¹,

Pinto²,

Guerreiro-Tanomaru³

et al. 2020

DOBCR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate flow, filling ability, and apical extrusion of three calcium silicate-based sealers, Neo MTA Plus (Avalon, USA), Bio-C Sealer (Angelus, Brazil) and Sealer Plus BC (MK Life, Brazil), in comparation with the gold standard based on epoxy resin, AH Plus (Dentsply, Germany). Methodology: The flow was evaluated based on ISO 6876/2012 standard (mm) and in area (mm2 ). For assessment of filling ability and apical extrusion of the sealers, curved artificial canals were prepared up to size 25.06, and filled with the sealers by the single cone technique. The samples were scanned in microcomputed tomography (SkyScan 1272. Bruker, Belgium) after preparation and after filling of the root canals. The percentage of voids throughout the entire extension of the root canals and in the apical third, besides the volume of apical extrusion of each sealer were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bio-C Sealer showed the highest flow and NeoMTA Plus had the lowest value (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer had lower percentage of total voids than NeoMTA Plus (p < 0.05). AH Plus had greater percentage of voids in the apical third than Bio-C Sealer and Sealer Plus BC (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer showed higher volume of extrusion (p < 0.05) than AH Plus and NeoMTA Plus. Conclusion: Bio-C Sealer and Sealer Plus BC had greater flow and proper filling ability in the apical third. However, these sealers presented high volume of apical extrusion. NeoMTA Plus provided less sealer extrusion, low flow, and more presence of voids.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Flow, Filling Ability and Apical Extrusion of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study

Torres¹,

Pinto²,

Guerreiro-Tanomaru³

et al. 2020

DOBCR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Periapical radiographs were taken and a scale from 0 to 4 was used to assess the penetration of the sealer into the root canals. It was observed that Endosequence BC Sealer showed similar ability to penetrate lateral canals as AH Plus [10].…”

Section: Editorialmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Candeiro, et al, studied the penetration ability of two endodontic cements (Endosequence BC Sealer and AH Plus) using 26 maxillary premolars that had 2 canals. Six lateral canals with two diameters (0.06 and 0.10 mm) were created in each root and filled with single crowns [10]. The teeth were divided into two groups; the first group used Endosequence BC Sealer and the second, AH Plus.…”

Section: Editorialmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioceramic Sealants: A Review

Diaconu¹

2022

JDHOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioceramic sealants are considered an advantageous technology in modern endodontics. The aim of this article is to highlight the characteristics of bioceramic sealants and to compare them with other root system sealing materials. An extensive search of the endodontic literature was conducted to identify publications related to bioceramic sealants. The results of laboratory and clinical studies on the biological and physical properties of bioceramic-based sealants, as well as comparative studies with other sealants, were evaluated. Several studies evaluated different properties of bioceramic-based sealants, including physical properties, biocompatibility, sealability, adhesion, solubility and antibacterial efficacy. Bioceramic-based sealants were found to be biocompatible and comparable to other commercial sealants. Clinical outcomes associated with the use of bioceramic-based root canal sealants are not established in the literature.

show abstract

“…Еще одно их положительное свойство -значительно лучшая герметизирующая способность, чем у других силеров [51][52][53]. Однако многие авторы в своих работах показывают отсутствие разницы в степени проникновения красителя в каналах, обтурированных биокерамическим герметиком и силером на основе эпоксидной смолы [54][55][56].…”

Section: адгезия к филлеру и дентинуunclassified

Positive and negative properties of four endodontic sealant groups: a systematic review

Chestnykh

Larichkin

Юсуфова

et al. 2021

Kuban. nauсh. med. vestnik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The choice of sealant is an important dentist’s decision with a long-term influence on treatment. Knowledge of the properties and characters of each material is key to the optimal endosealer selection on individual basis.Objectives. A comparison of endodontic sealants based on epoxy resins, calcium hydroxide, zinc oxide eugenol and bioceramics.Methods. Publications were mined in the PubMed and Google Scholar electronic databases to cover the four sealer groups (epoxy, calcium hydroxide, zinc oxide eugenol and bioceramics) over years 2014-2021, including selected relevant sources within 2002-2013; 73 articles were considered for review, regardless of the study design or language. Content and descriptive analyses were used as research tools. Meta-analysis was not used due to a high evidence heterogeneity.Results. The dental market currently offers a variety of sealant groups. Endodontic sealants based on epoxy resins, zinc oxide eugenol, calcium hydroxide and bioceramics are the most common. The review identifies no ideal material for the root canal filling.Conclusion. Manifold studies demonstrate the pros and cons in each endodontic sealant group with respect to variant criteria. Depending on clinical situation, the practitioner can opt for the material property to identify the endosealer.

show abstract

Penetration of bioceramic and epoxy-resin endodontic cements into lateral canals

Abstract: Ilana Thaís de Freitas LIMA (a) Bruno Carvalho de VASCONCELOS (c) Nilton Vivacqua GOMES (b) Elaine Faga IGLECIAS (d) Giulio GAVINI (d)

Cited by 14 publications

References 33 publications

Flow, Filling Ability and Apical Extrusion of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study

Flow, Filling Ability and Apical Extrusion of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study

Bioceramic Sealants: A Review

Positive and negative properties of four endodontic sealant groups: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About