1997
DOI: 10.1080/00102209708935747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration and Dispersion of Transient Gas Jets and Sprays

Abstract: Results from numerical computations performed to represent the transient behavior of axisymmetric non-vaporizing and vaporizing sprays injected into a constant volume chamber are presented. These results are compared with those from vaporizing spray experiments where, for the same mass and momentum flow rates, the effect of chamber density on spray penetration and dispersion angle was studied. It is shown that with the practical numerical resolution employed here, which appears to be inadequate, the results do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RANS model employed in this study has been extensively employed in prior studies of gas jets and sprays [7][8][9][10]. Turbulence is modeled using a twoequation k-e model.…”
Section: Computational Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RANS model employed in this study has been extensively employed in prior studies of gas jets and sprays [7][8][9][10]. Turbulence is modeled using a twoequation k-e model.…”
Section: Computational Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent constant-density gas jet has a diameter ͑d͒ of O͑1 mm͒ and the same injection velocity. 36,37 If a spreading rate of 0.095 is assumed for the jet and the turbulent length scale is assumed to be 0.15 of the jet half-width, 38 the value of the length scale at 30d is about 430 m. Length scales at shorter axial distances will be even smaller. The vortex length scales selected in this work lie in the range of 100-400 m, which represent integral scales at axial locations upstream of 30d.…”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed values have been quoted in the range of 0.115± 0.128 (Wilcox[1], Wood & Chen[14]). Our work is motivated by our interest in round jets in the context of our general work in the area of diesel engine jets (Abraham & Magi[6], Iyer & Abraham[15], Iyer & Abraham[16], Post et al[17]). In typical diesel engines, the vaporizing diesel spray is similar to a turbulent round jet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%