2001
DOI: 10.1080/104077801753238130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE k-ε MODEL AND COMPUTED SPREADING RATES IN ROUND AND PLANE JETS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a popular, robust model with a relatively low computational cost and which has shown good results according to several authors [8,14,20] as well as in the current validation process. It was necessary to modify the C1 constant from 1.44 to 1.52 due to the high propagation rate of the hydrogen jet, found in this model by [30]. The realizable K-ε model differs from the standard in the formulation of the equation for the turbulent dissipation rate and in C µ , , which becomes a variable as opposed to a constant in the standard.…”
Section: Preprocessing Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a popular, robust model with a relatively low computational cost and which has shown good results according to several authors [8,14,20] as well as in the current validation process. It was necessary to modify the C1 constant from 1.44 to 1.52 due to the high propagation rate of the hydrogen jet, found in this model by [30]. The realizable K-ε model differs from the standard in the formulation of the equation for the turbulent dissipation rate and in C µ , , which becomes a variable as opposed to a constant in the standard.…”
Section: Preprocessing Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transient-state solvers with the second-order upwind scheme were adopted. Pressure-based realizable k-ϵ turbulence model was used since it gave a better accuracy in the study ( [15] , [16] , [17] ).…”
Section: Numerical Simulation(computational Model and Boundary Condit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a popular, robust model, with relatively low computational cost and which has shown good results, according to several authors, [5], [8], [16], as well as in the current validation process. It was necessary to modify the C1 constant from 1.44 to 1.52 due to a high propagation rate of the hydrogen jet, found in this model by [36]. The Realizable K -ε model differs from the Standard in the formulation of the equation for turbulent dissipation rate and in Cμ , , which becomes a variable as opposed to a constant in the Standard.…”
Section: Preprocessing Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%