2000
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.8.650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetrance of Mutations in the Familial Wilms Tumor Gene FWT1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the earliest time point examined (10 mo of age), there was no significant difference in tumor incidence between neoDES and neoVEH carriers (10% vs. 23%). However, even at 10 mo, the earliest time at which grossly observable tumors were seen, tumors were larger in the neoDES vs. neoVEH animals (0.16 vs. 0.01 cm 3 ), and this trend continued in the 13-mo-old females (13.70 vs. 1.10 cm 3 ) and became significant by 16 mo (P Ͻ 0.05, Table 1). Therefore, consistent with previous studies in this model, loss of function of the remaining wild-type allele appeared to be a rate-limiting event for tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Fig 2 Des-induced Developmental Programming Alters Steroidmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the earliest time point examined (10 mo of age), there was no significant difference in tumor incidence between neoDES and neoVEH carriers (10% vs. 23%). However, even at 10 mo, the earliest time at which grossly observable tumors were seen, tumors were larger in the neoDES vs. neoVEH animals (0.16 vs. 0.01 cm 3 ), and this trend continued in the 13-mo-old females (13.70 vs. 1.10 cm 3 ) and became significant by 16 mo (P Ͻ 0.05, Table 1). Therefore, consistent with previous studies in this model, loss of function of the remaining wild-type allele appeared to be a rate-limiting event for tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Fig 2 Des-induced Developmental Programming Alters Steroidmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, defects in these genes are rarely 100% penetrant, and, even in families harboring the same genetic mutation, the penetrance of the tumor-suppressor-gene defect can vary significantly (1)(2)(3)(4). The importance of geneenvironment interactions in contributing to individual differences in tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance was recently highlighted in the New York Breast Cancer Study, which evaluated the breast and ovarian cancer risk in female relatives harboring mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor-suppressor genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the penetrance of FWT1 at least appears to be low, of the order of 15-30%. 15 It is therefore possible that a substantial proportion of apparently sporadic cases of Wilms' tumour carry a constitutional mutation in a low penetrance familial Wilms' tumour gene.…”
Section: Familial Wilms' Tumourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breslow et al have shown that 1% -3% of cases of Wilms tumor are familial and that a predisposition to Wilms tumor is most likely caused by rare germline mutations acting in a dominant fashion [13]. Constitutional mutations in the WT1 gene on chromosome 11p13 predispose an individual to Wilms tumor and are associated with genitourinary abnormalities [4]. Several genetic syndromes (e.g., Denys-Drash syndrome) have been correlated with intragenic WT1 mutations [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several genetic loci have been shown to be associated with tumor formation, including WT1 on chromosome 11p13, WT2 on chromosome 11p15, FWT1 on chromosome 17q12-q21, and FWT2 on 19q [3,4]. WT1 is the first and most important gene to be isolated [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%