2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0503218102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between genetic susceptibility and early-life environmental exposure determines tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance

Abstract: Gene-environment interactions are important determinants of cancer risk. Traditionally, gene-environment interactions are thought to contribute to tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance by facilitating or inhibiting the acquisition of additional somatic mutations required for tumorigenesis. Here, we demonstrate that a distinctive type of gene-environment interaction can occur during development to enhance the penetrance of a tumorsuppressor-gene defect in the adult. Using rats carrying a germ-line defect in the tube… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, genes whose protein products appear, at least in some tumour types, to contribute to the neoplastic phenotype continue to be identified. While it is the case that mutations are crucial to the role of many oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes in neoplasia, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the neoplastic phenotype can be a consequence of alterations in gene expression, with haploinsufficiency being an increasingly common theme (Mao et al, 2004), coupled with environmental factors, often having a multifaceted spatial (Orimo et al, 2005) and temporal interplay (Cook et al, 2005). Furthermore, the surprising revelation of how relatively few genes we have in the human genome and the extent of alternate splicing that exists, highlights the possibility that the range of genes whose products will have a role in neoplasia will continue to grow as we develop a more detailed understanding of the molecular events that regulate cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, genes whose protein products appear, at least in some tumour types, to contribute to the neoplastic phenotype continue to be identified. While it is the case that mutations are crucial to the role of many oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes in neoplasia, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the neoplastic phenotype can be a consequence of alterations in gene expression, with haploinsufficiency being an increasingly common theme (Mao et al, 2004), coupled with environmental factors, often having a multifaceted spatial (Orimo et al, 2005) and temporal interplay (Cook et al, 2005). Furthermore, the surprising revelation of how relatively few genes we have in the human genome and the extent of alternate splicing that exists, highlights the possibility that the range of genes whose products will have a role in neoplasia will continue to grow as we develop a more detailed understanding of the molecular events that regulate cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, functional ER-a overexpression seems to be associated with the carcinogenicity of arsenic in several tissues. Based on these data, we hypothesize that arsenic in utero may attack a critical pool of progenitor cells in urogenital system and induce aberrant genetic ''reprograming'' as part of its carcinogenic mechanism, in a fashion similar to that thought to occur in early life exposure to diethylstilbestrol (36). An intrauterine component of estrogen carcinogenesis involving stem cells has been long suspected (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Eker rats carry a germ line defect in the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 tumor-suppressor gene and approximately 65% develop hormone-dependent uterine leiomyomas. 52 Exposure of females to DES on days 3-5 after birth increases the tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance to more than 90%. In principle, stress, which has been shown to have organizational actions of behavior in rats via an effect on the HPA, could have a similar potentiating effect on epigenetically induced transgenerational imprints as well as on genetic predisposition to develop disease.…”
Section: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Sociosexual and Emotional Behavmentioning
confidence: 99%