2020
DOI: 10.31869/rtj.v3i2.1776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penentuan Prioritas Pemeliharaan Jalan Studi Kasus Kota Payakumbuh Provinsi Sumatera Barat

Abstract: Jalan adalah prasarana transportasi darat yang meliputi segala bagian jalan, termasuk bangunan pelengkap dan perlengkapannya yang diperuntukkan bagi lalu lintas. Rencana pemeliharaan jalan yang baik merupakan unsur penting dalam pengelolaan jalan.Salah satu aspek terpenting dalam menjaga kondisi jalan adalah rencana prioritas pemeliharaan jalan. Penentuan prioritas pemeliharaan jalan sering tidak mempunyai standar yang dapat dipertanggung jawabkan dan masih didominasi oleh kebijakan pengambil keputusan serta … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results had similarities with 3 previous relevant studies, where the dominant criteria were the road damage (0.197) and conditions (0.323 and 0.39) in Pidie Regency [16], as well as Aceh Besar District [17], respectively. Meanwhile, these were different from 4 previous studies, where the dominant criteria in Aceh Jaya [18], Payakumbuh [19], and Pidie Jaya [20,21] Regencies were the social, policy, accessibility, and upgrade…”
Section: Paired Criteria Comparison Matrixcontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…These results had similarities with 3 previous relevant studies, where the dominant criteria were the road damage (0.197) and conditions (0.323 and 0.39) in Pidie Regency [16], as well as Aceh Besar District [17], respectively. Meanwhile, these were different from 4 previous studies, where the dominant criteria in Aceh Jaya [18], Payakumbuh [19], and Pidie Jaya [20,21] Regencies were the social, policy, accessibility, and upgrade…”
Section: Paired Criteria Comparison Matrixcontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…b) The calculation of the respondent's score and the percentage of pedestrian comfort level was then arrived at. c) Class Intervals and Sidewalk Comfort Level Criteria were then arrived at as follows: The instruments employed in this investigation are a modification of the comfort factor that researchers (Hidayat et al, 2020) developed and modified. C1_The surface of the pedestrian path is not slippery.…”
Section: Class Intervals and Sidewalk Comfort Level Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%