2011
DOI: 10.3354/dao02343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penaeus monodon is protected against gill- associated virus by muscle injection but not oral delivery of bacterially expressed dsRNAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…monodon is consistent with its ability to protect P. monodon against disease following challenge with GAV (Sellars et al 2011). The finding that the single dsGAV1 dsRNA targeted to the extreme 5'-terminus of the GAV genome reduced infection loads slightly more rapidly and substantially was interesting, and in a practical context would reduce complexity and cost of dsRNA production in any commercial application of technology.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…monodon is consistent with its ability to protect P. monodon against disease following challenge with GAV (Sellars et al 2011). The finding that the single dsGAV1 dsRNA targeted to the extreme 5'-terminus of the GAV genome reduced infection loads slightly more rapidly and substantially was interesting, and in a practical context would reduce complexity and cost of dsRNA production in any commercial application of technology.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Target site positions for dsRNAs in the GAV ORF1a/1b gene, thus restricting their action to the genomic-length ssRNA transcribed in low abundance and critical for translating enzymes essential for generating genome replication machinery, were as reported previously (Sellars et al 2011), except that the dsGAV5 target region overlapping the helicase motif in ORF1b was substituted for another region (dsGAV6; 17237-18014 nt; GenBank Acc. AF227196.2) positioned slightly further downstream ( Table 1).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, dsRNA directed to the endogenous Gen β-actin in the giant tiger prawn P. monodon caused death (100%) when applied by injection (25 µL shrimp saline solution containing the various dsRNA purified from bacteria). In contrast, no deaths were reported when dsRNA was orally administered in food with bacteria expressing specific dsRNA (6.0 × 10 10 bacteria/g, extruded feed with β-actindsRNA) (35). Similar results were observed when silencing the viral gene of the associated virus of the gills (GAV) of the giant tiger prawn with bacteria expressing specific dsRNA (4.9 × 10 10 bacteria/g extruded feed of GAV-dsRNA) where survival was 97% by injection and 15-35% by oral administration (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Por ejemplo, el dsRNA dirigido al gen endógeno β-actina del camarón P. monodon fue capaz de causar la muerte (al 100%) cuando se aplicaba por inyección (25 µl de solución salina de camarón, que contiene los diversos dsRNA purificados a partir de bacterias). Mientras que, no se reportaron mortalidades cuando se administró el dsRNA por vía oral en alimento administrado con bacterias que expresaba dsRNA especifico (6.0 × 10 10 bacterias/g de alimento extruido con β-actin-dsRNA) (35). Resultados similares fueron observados al silenciar el gen viral del virus asociado a las branquias (GAV) del camarón P. monodon con bacterias que expresaban dsRNA especifico (4.9 × 10 10 bacterias/g de alimento extruido con GAV-dsRNA) donde la supervivencia fue del 97% por inyección, y del 15-35% por administración oral (36).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified