1965
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(65)80250-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pemphigus vulgaris in a 12-year-old boy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…' Only five patients have been reported with biopsy proven childhood pem¬ phigus vulgaris. [2][3][4][5][6] In every case the correct diagnosis was delayed due to the low index of suspicion for this dis¬ ease in a young patient. In each in¬ stance the process presented in¬ sidiously with erosions confined to the oral mucous membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…' Only five patients have been reported with biopsy proven childhood pem¬ phigus vulgaris. [2][3][4][5][6] In every case the correct diagnosis was delayed due to the low index of suspicion for this dis¬ ease in a young patient. In each in¬ stance the process presented in¬ sidiously with erosions confined to the oral mucous membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 17 boys and 16 girls. The age at the onset of the disease varied from 1.5 to 12 years (mean 8.3 yrs) (8–36). Thirty patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids alone or in combination with ISA for periods that ranged from 0.3 to 11.2 years (mean 4.5 yrs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids alone or in combination with ISA for periods that ranged from 0.3 to 11.2 years (mean 4.5 yrs). They were followed up for periods ranging from 0.3 to 16 years (mean 5.2 yrs) (8,12–15,17,19,22–36). There were no data provided on the duration of treatment or follow‐up on four patients, but information on the clinical outcome was provided (9–11,16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sixteen cases of histologically proven pemphigus vulgaris in patients aged 16 and under have been reported since 1955 (Berger et al, 1973;Canizares & Dorsey, 1956;Elias et al, 1972;Hadida et al, 1966;Jordan, Ihrig & Perry, 1969;Khamaganova, Vedrova & Lukiyanova, 1977;Lehman, Landau & Newcomer, 1965;Menter, Bell & Wells, 1973;Mincer, Turner & Sibelius, 1975;Mintzer & Rubin, 1955;Murphy & Harrell, 1972;Paltzik & Laude, 1978;Petkov & Georgiva, 1966;Stiegleder, 1955;Walker, 1978;Wranicz, Sysa Jedrzejowska & Broniarezyk-Dyla, 1975). Ten were female and six male.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%