Pemodelan Indeks Pembangunan Kesehatan Masyarakat Kabupaten/Kota di Pulau Kalimantan Menggunakan Pendekatan Regresi Probit

Fathurahman, M.

doi:10.30812/varian.v2i2.382

“…Macro portrait of economic growth on the island of Sumatra in 2011 was within an average of 6.33 percent (Jayanti, 2017), but in 2020 it contracted quite strongly to -1.25 percent (Nugroho & Muhyiddin, 2021). With the same pattern for the economic growth of the island of Kalimantan (Fathurahman, 2019), in 2011 it was able to create growth in the economic activity of 6.49 percent (Prasetyo, 2011). However, with the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak in early 2020 (Indayani & Hartono, 2020), it had a real impact on the economic structure of Kalimantan Island to -1.79 percent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Economic Facts Of Sumatra And Kalimantan Islands For 10 Years

Kekry¹,

Fahmi²

2021

Jurnal sostech

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The formulation of this scientific research problem is what are the scientific facts that can be obtained, for 10 years on the island of Sumatra and Kalimantan. Research purposes: The purpose of this study is identifying scientific facts the direction and pattern of economic growth that occurs on the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan. Research methods: The researcher applied quantitative approach, along with descriptive quantitative techniques. Research results: The results of this research are, there are 2 patterns of economic growth on the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan during these 10 years. The trend towards growth on these two islands is, has a fluctuating tendency and has indications of a downward trend over the past 10 years. Some special findings are: (1) Aceh Province is quite risky, because over the past 10 years has historical economic growth movements that form the depth of the valley (can be indicated recession), (2) East Kalimantan as many as 4 times over the last 10 years, experiencing negative economic growth, (3) The plantation sector, through CPO exports is able to have its own impact, on the economy of South Kalimantan in 2020. Specifically for economic growth in 2020, it is a special record because of the overall economic growth of 10 provinces on the island of Sumatra and 5 provinces on the island of Kalimantan with negative growth performance. Conclusion: For Sumatra Island there are 2 different forms of patterns between provinces, pattern 1: Aceh, Riau and Riau Islands. For the case of Aceh province is quite risky because for the past 10 years, it has historical economic growth movements that can indicate recession

show abstract

“…Dalam penelitian lain yang dilakukan oleh Sarita (2020) menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan metode Principal Component Logistic Regression (PCLR) data IPKM juga dipengaruhi oleh IPM. Fathurahman (2019), pada penelitian lainnya dengan lokus yang sama namun metode yang berbeda yaitu regresi probit menemukan salah satu faktor yang memengaruhi IPKM kabupaten/kota di Pulau Kalimantan tahun 2013 adalah IPM. IPM merupakan singkatan dari Indeks Pembangunan Manusia dibentuk oleh 3 dimensi dasar.…”

Section: Variabel Yang Diduga Memengaruhi Ipkmunclassified

Analisis Regresi Spasial Indeks Pembangunan Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Paradoks Simpson Kabupaten/Kota di Pulau Sumatera Tahun 2018

Krismayanto¹,

Pasaribu²

2022

semnasoffstat

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kesehatan merupakan aspek penting dalam pembangunan manusia. Angka Harapan Hidup (AHH) digunakan sebagai indikator kesehatan dalam Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM). Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia (Kemenkes RI) menyusun Indeks Pembangunan Kesehatan Masyarakat (IPKM). IPKM merupakan indikator yang lebih rinci menjabarkan terkait kesehatan masyarakat. Nilai IPKM di Pulau Sumatera sangat beragam, berbeda dengan pulau-pulau lain di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh gambaran umum variabel yang diteliti, mengidentifikasi adanya efek spasial, menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi IPKM secara global dan lokal, dan mengidentifikasi fenomena Paradoks Simpson dengan membandingkan hasil metode Regresi Linier Berganda (RLB) dan Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). Penelitian ini terdiri dari 154 kabupaten/kota di 10 provinsi Pulau Sumatera. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat heterogenitas spasial, AHH berpengaruh di 62,99% kabupaten/kota di Pulau Sumatera. Rata-rata Lama Sekolah (RLS), Pengeluaran per Kapita serta Jumlah Penduduk berpengaruh masing-masing sebesar di 80,52%; 49,35%; 35,71% kabupaten/kota. Terdapat perbedaan arah pengaruh di beberapa wilayah pada beberapa variabel antara metode RLB dan GWR. Hal ini menunjukkan terjadinya fenomena Paradoks Simpson. Berdasarkan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi IPKM menunjukkan adanya pengelompokan berdasarkan variabel yang memengaruhinya.

show abstract

“…Macro portrait of economic growth on the island of Sumatra in 2011 was within an average of 6.33 percent (Jayanti, 2017), but in 2020 it contracted quite strongly to -1.25 percent (Nugroho & Muhyiddin, 2021). With the same pattern for the economic growth of the island of Kalimantan (Fathurahman, 2019), in 2011 it was able to create growth in the economic activity of 6.49 percent (Prasetyo, 2011). However, with the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak in early 2020 (Indayani & Hartono, 2020), it had a real impact on the economic structure of Kalimantan Island to -1.79 percent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic Facts Of Sumatra And Kalimantan Islands For 10 Years

Kekry¹,

Fahmi²

2021

SOSTECH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The formulation of this scientific research problem is what are the scientific facts that can be obtained, for 10 years on the island of Sumatra and Kalimantan. Research purposes: The purpose of this study is identifying scientific facts the direction and pattern of economic growth that occurs on the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan. Research methods: The researcher applied quantitative approach, along with descriptive quantitative techniques. Research results: The results of this research are, there are 2 patterns of economic growth on the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan during these 10 years. The trend towards growth on these two islands is, has a fluctuating tendency and has indications of a downward trend over the past 10 years. Some special findings are: (1) Aceh Province is quite risky, because over the past 10 years has historical economic growth movements that form the depth of the valley (can be indicated recession), (2) East Kalimantan as many as 4 times over the last 10 years, experiencing negative economic growth, (3) The plantation sector, through CPO exports is able to have its own impact, on the economy of South Kalimantan in 2020. Specifically for economic growth in 2020, it is a special record because of the overall economic growth of 10 provinces on the island of Sumatra and 5 provinces on the island of Kalimantan with negative growth performance. Conclusion: For Sumatra Island there are 2 different forms of patterns between provinces, pattern 1: Aceh, Riau and Riau Islands. For the case of Aceh province is quite risky because for the past 10 years, it has historical economic growth movements that can indicate recession

show abstract

Pemodelan Indeks Pembangunan Kesehatan Masyarakat Kabupaten/Kota di Pulau Kalimantan Menggunakan Pendekatan Regresi Probit

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Economic Facts Of Sumatra And Kalimantan Islands For 10 Years

Economic Facts Of Sumatra And Kalimantan Islands For 10 Years

Analisis Regresi Spasial Indeks Pembangunan Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Paradoks Simpson Kabupaten/Kota di Pulau Sumatera Tahun 2018

Economic Facts Of Sumatra And Kalimantan Islands For 10 Years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About