Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Pieter, Salvadoris; Silambi, Erni Dwita

doi:10.35724/jrj.v3i1.1940

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Prior to the actual act of killing, there exists a period during which the perpetrator has the opportunity to calmly contemplate various aspects, such as the method by which the murder will be executed. This interval occurs between the emergence of the intention to kill and the actual implementation of the act (Pieter & Silambi, 2019) The penalty for premeditated murder is harsher compared to the homicides described in Articles 338 and 339 of the Criminal Code. It is, in fact, the most severe form of homicide punishable by death.…”

Section: B Elements Of the Crime Of Premeditated Murdermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The death penalty is not applicable to other crimes against life, making premeditated murder stand out due to the presence of preplanning. Apart from the death penalty, individuals convicted of premeditated murder may also receive a life sentence or imprisonment for a specific duration of up to twenty years (Pieter & Silambi, 2019).…”

Section: B Elements Of the Crime Of Premeditated Murdermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Role of Motive Evidence in Premeditated Murder Cases

Fikrillah,

Uddin,

Khairani Pancaningrum

2024

IJSSRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of proving motive in cases of premeditated murder, as well as to determine the significance of proving motive in such cases. This research falls under the category of normative legal research, employing a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The findings of this study reveal that proving motive in premeditated murder serves three main functions. Firstly, it helps establish the involvement of individuals in criminal activities. Secondly, it assists in determining the elements of criminal liability. Lastly, it plays a crucial role in determining the severity of punishment. Consequently, proving motive holds a fundamental position in establishing criminal acts, particularly in cases of premeditated murder. The position of motive in premeditated murder necessitates the presentation of various arguments, as outlined in this thesis. One key argument is the essentiality and necessity of motive in proving the core offense of "intentionally" as stipulated in Article 340 of the premeditated murder statute.

show abstract

Section: B Elements Of the Crime Of Premeditated Murdermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B Elements Of the Crime Of Premeditated Murdermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Motive Evidence in Premeditated Murder Cases

Fikrillah,

Uddin,

Khairani Pancaningrum

2024

IJSSRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Sedangkan unsur subjektif yang diwujudkan oleh mens rea memiliki arti sebagai suatu unsur yang melekat pada diri pelaku dan tertanam di dalam hatinya, atau secara sederhana diartikan sebagai sikap batin pelaku saat melakukan tindak pidana serta hal-hal yang mendorong pelaku merealisasikan perbuatannya. 6 Kedua unsur tersebut sejatinya berhubungan satu sama lain dan tidak terpisahkan, di mana keterkaitan keduanya pun dapat digambarkan melalui suatu bentuk ekspresi yaitu "actus reus non reus facit reum nisi mens sit rea". 7 Adagium "actus non reus facit reum nisi mens rea" sejatinya memperlihatkan bahwa suatu perbuatan tidak membuat pelakunya bersalah, kecuali pikirannya jahat 8 , istilah actus reus dan mens rea sebenarnya lebih dikenal pada common law system, khususnya negara Inggris, sehingga actus reus dan mens rea ini bukanlah istilah yang dipelajari di Indonesia.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Dwi Rizqiqa, Budi Arta Atmaja, Penentuan Mens Rea…………. p-ISSN : 2460-6820 │ e-ISSN : 2686-5920 Jurnal Belo Vol 6. No.…”

unclassified

Penentuan Mens Rea Dalam Unsur Perencanaan Terlebih Dahulu Pada Perkara Penganiayaan Pasal 353 Ayat 2 KUHP Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia

Rizqiqa

Atmaja

2021

J. Belo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kasus penganiayaan tak henti-hentinya menjadi sorotan publik, tak hanya penganiayaan yang dilakukan secara spontan, namun juga yang direncanakan terlebih dahulu dan menimbulkan luka berat sebagaimana yang diatur di dalam Pasal 353 ayat 2 KUHP. Seperti yang kita ketahui, penganiayaan berencana sendiri merupakan salah satu tindak pidana. Di mana, terdapat dua unsur di dalamnya antara lain: Actus Reus yaitu suatu perbuatan yang menurut masyarakat tercela dan patut dihukum, dan Mens Rea atau niat jahat pelaku. Adapun keterkaitan keduanya dapat dilihat dalam bentuk ekspresi “actus non reus facit reum nisi mens sit rea”. Secara konseptual, tergambar secara jelas penentuan niat jahat (mens rea) di dalam suatu perbuatan (actus reus) khususnya tindak pidana penganiayaan berencana yang mengakibatkan luka berat, namun nyatanya dalam tatanan implementasi, hal ini masih menjadi menimbulkan perdebatan, yaitu terdapat perbedaan penafsiran serta penerapan unsur mens rea dalam tindak pidana penganiayaan berencana. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Sedangkan spesifikasi penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis. Bahan hukum diperoleh melalui studi dokumen atau kepustakaan, yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif, komprehensif, dan lengkap. Di dalam penelitian ini akan dikaji mengenai penafsiran dan penerapan unsur mens rea pada tindak pidana penganiayaan berencana dari berbagai putusan, sehingga kesimpulan dari penelitian ini untuk memberikan penjelasan mengenai penentuan mens rea yang diterapkan pada masing-masing kasus, serta memberikan pemahaman dan saran guna menentukan parameter untuk mengukur mens rea pada perkara penganiayaan berencana yang mengakibatkan luka berat sebagaimana Pasal 353 ayat 2 KUHP. Abstract Persecution cases, not just spontaneously but also planned and resulting in severe injury, regulated in Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 353 Paragraph 2, are continuously gaining public’s attention. As we have known, Actus Reus is an act that in society’s perspectives are disgraceful be punishable. Actus Reus heavily related to Mens Rea or malicious intent of the perpetrators. Both connections can be seen in the expression of “actus non reus facit reum nisi mens sit rea”. Conceptually, the malicious intent of perpetrators (mens rea) are clearly shown in an act (actus reus), especially a planned persecution crime that causing a heavy injury. But in real implementation, this case is still on debate. There are different interpretation and application of mens rea factor in planned persecution crimes. This research is normative study through law approach with secondary data in a form of primary, secondary and tertiary law and legal sources. However, the specification of this research is a descriptive analysis. Law and legal sources obtained from literature studies that are analyzed completely and comprehensively. This research would examine the interpretation and application of mens rea factors in planned persecution crime from different verdicts. So the conclusion of this research will give clearer explanation to determine mens rea in each cases and give deeper understanding and suggestion to define a parameter to mens rea in severe injury-planned persecution crime based on Article 353 Paragraph 2.

show abstract

“…The Tribunal considered that the premeditated act between the emergence of the intent to kill and its execution there was still time for the maker to calmly think about, for example, how the murder would be carried out. (Pieter & Silambi, 2019) A plan is deemed to exist in advance if the defendant has considered and considered it for a sufficient amount of time and then determines the time, place, method or means, etc., which will be used for the murder.…”

Section: Elements Intentionally and Premeditated Taking The Lives Of ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Judge's Legal Analysis of Murder Offices

Assaad

Mursyid

Setyaningsih

2021

GRLSPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to describe the basis for the application of criminal law to the crime of murder that occurred in Wajo Regency and to find out the judge's considerations in making a decision on case Number 156/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sengkang through legal principles and legal norms that were taken into consideration. The research method that uses this case approach shows in the results of the study that the application of material punishment for the offense of murder is in accordance with applicable legal norms, all elements of criminal acts regulated in the applicable regulations in Indonesia have been met in which the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 14 (fourteen) years. twelve) years. The judge's legal considerations for the murder offense in the case were in accordance with the elements proven in the trial, so that the panel of judges based on the facts at trial judged that the defendant could be held accountable for his actions with the consideration that at the time he committed his actions the defendant was aware of the consequences and did not prevent him from doing so. the intention is that the perpetrator in carrying out his actions is in good health and capable of considering elements against the law, and there is no reason for the abolition of the crime.

show abstract

Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

The Role of Motive Evidence in Premeditated Murder Cases

The Role of Motive Evidence in Premeditated Murder Cases

Penentuan Mens Rea Dalam Unsur Perencanaan Terlebih Dahulu Pada Perkara Penganiayaan Pasal 353 Ayat 2 KUHP Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia

Judge's Legal Analysis of Murder Offices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About