2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: Survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
160
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
15
160
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, combined pelvic surgery is used with curative intent in order to achieve radical resection and improve treatment results. According to latest data, a 5-year survival after pelvic exenteration is more than 50% [4][5][6][7]. Goldberg JM et al (1998) concluded that the indications for palliative exenteration should be exceptional and strictly individual, and, generally, this type of surgery should not be used for palliation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, combined pelvic surgery is used with curative intent in order to achieve radical resection and improve treatment results. According to latest data, a 5-year survival after pelvic exenteration is more than 50% [4][5][6][7]. Goldberg JM et al (1998) concluded that the indications for palliative exenteration should be exceptional and strictly individual, and, generally, this type of surgery should not be used for palliation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87 Five-year survival rates after pelvic exenteration are 20 to 45%. [87][88][89] RT is more commonly offered to isolated vaginal or pelvic recurrence, with surgery reserved for RT failures in women who are with comorbidities, such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension. Five-year survival rates are 50%.…”
Section: Treatment Of Recurrent Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine ähnliche Altersverteilung eruierten in ihren Auswertungen Kolbert (60 Jahre (28 -87 Jahre)), Hafner (60 Jahre (19 -83)), Pinelo (55,7 Jahre), Fleisch (55 Jahre (22 -77 Jahre)), Morley (53 Jahre (21 -74 Jahre)) und Crozier (47 Jahre (22 -70 Jahre)) (Crozier et al, 1995;Kolbert et al, 1997;Morley et al, 1989;Hafner et al, 1992;Pinelo et al, 2006;Fleisch et al, 2007). In der Studie von Berek reichte das Altersspektrum von 26 bis 74 Jahren (Berek et al, 2005). In der Arbeit von Durgatosh lag das Durchschnittsalter bei 45 Jahren (Durgatosh et al, 2004).…”
Section: Altersverteilungunclassified
“…Der Anteil der Zervixkarzinome liegt bei 13 -97%, der der Vulvakarzinome bei 1 -61%, der der Korpuskarzinome bei 2-13%, der der Vaginalkarzinome bei 2 -14%, der der Ovarialkarzinome und der der Sarkome bei 1 -8% (Brunschwig, 1959;Kiselow, 1967;Rodriguez-Bigas et al, 1996;Aleksic et al, 1998;Houvenaeghel et al, 2004;Durgatosh et al, 2004;Berek et al, 2005;Lambrou et al, 2005;Morley et al, 1989;Goldberg et al, 2006;Wydra et al, 2006;Pinelo et al, 2006;Mourton et al, 2006;Fleisch et al, 2007). Die meisten Autoren sehen allerdings ein lokal fortgeschrittenes oder ein rezidivierendes Zervixkarzinom, welches sich durch ein vorzugsweise lokales Wachstum und erst spätere Fernmetastasierung ausgezeichnet, als die häufigste Indikation zur Exenteration (Brunschwig, 1960;Kiselow, 1967;Di Saia et al, 1973;Rodriguez-Bigas et al, 1996;Petri, 2001;Hillemans et al, 2004;Lambrou et al, 2005).…”
Section: Indikationunclassified