2014
DOI: 10.1080/14790726.2014.932814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-to-peer Learning in the Higher Degree by Research Context: A Creative Writing Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In supervisor-run groups, a member of academic staff is usually responsible for organising timetables and agendas, booking rooms, providing catering, and moderating the meetings, and these groups often follow structured agendas, with students sharing work such as presenting conference papers, talking about individual journeys, holding discussion groups, presenting their individual research findings, and sharing knowledge about 'practical matters' (Stracke 2010: 6). Groups run specifically for creative writing students are additionally concerned with sharing and receiving feedback on their creative work (Batty & Sinclair 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In supervisor-run groups, a member of academic staff is usually responsible for organising timetables and agendas, booking rooms, providing catering, and moderating the meetings, and these groups often follow structured agendas, with students sharing work such as presenting conference papers, talking about individual journeys, holding discussion groups, presenting their individual research findings, and sharing knowledge about 'practical matters' (Stracke 2010: 6). Groups run specifically for creative writing students are additionally concerned with sharing and receiving feedback on their creative work (Batty & Sinclair 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because they often re-enter the academy after a number of years working as practitioners and/or educators in industry and/or teaching settings, sometimes without Honours or Masters qualifications – at least those completed recently – and thus enter a doctoral program with less of a research identity than those in more traditional research disciplines (see Finlayson, 2012; Masson, 2016; Wilson, 2018). A core part of the research training context in these disciplines, then, is the formation of a new identity, that of the ‘practitioner-researcher’, which can – at first – be a struggle for doctoral candidates before such training, hopefully, then becoming liberating and generating a new approach to practice (Batty, 2016; Batty and Sinclair, 2014). Central to this successful experience of research training is the skillset of the supervisory team, who, as Kroll outlines, must perform a myriad of (perhaps impossible) roles in the creative practice space:Like an earth mother, she nurtures her children, managing to give each one enough attention.…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To promote cultural change, researchers need to see research integrity as a core value of their own cohort. Peer-to-peer learning may be particularly important for higher degree research students [34]. This is something we are aiming to facilitate in future iterations of the course.…”
Section: Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%