“…Studies that consider the spatial distribution of P2P at a country or regional scale indicate that rural areas are late adopters of this trend, as the volume of this type of supply is comparatively less than that found in urban areas. However, the year-on-year growth rate is greater in rural areas, with dynamics that accelerate as the result of the state of maturity and/or collapse experienced by this form of accommodation in urban areas [12,15,25,30,31]. It is difficult to determine how rural areas have adopted the P2P phenomenon and to establish types of rural areas in relation to P2P because: (a) There are many types of rural areas with highly varied territorial dynamics (high mountain compared to mid-mountain, inland or coastal hinterland, to mention a few), (b) tourism in rural areas is more scattered than tourism in cities, which is generally concentrated, and (c) the forms of tourism are highly varied in rural areas, which results in a wide range of models of tourism development (for example, intensive mass tourism associated with the snow and winter in high mountain areas compared to alternative tourism, such as agrotourism or nature tourism, which is more respectful and sustainable in relation to economic tradition, the environment and the culture of these territories), compared to the greater uniformity in urban tourism practices.…”