1978
DOI: 10.1080/00405847809542773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer support system as the heart of inservice education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Justifying the employment of peercentered systems, Bryant and Haack (1977), stress &dquo;one of the greatest reservoirs for improvement of instruction exists in the competence of excellent teachers in every school building in this nation.&dquo; Lawrence and Branch (1978) advocate peer support as the heart of inservice education; the &dquo;Principals In-Service Program&dquo; developed by /I/D/E/A/ (LaPlant, 1978) based on a collegial-support concept, is being adopted by numerous administrative teams throughout the nation; and, finally, Anderson (1979), reporting on a successful peer supervision program, states: &dquo;it excited and inspired some of us to believe more earnestly in the vitality and promise not only of cooperative staffing patterns but also of cooperative administrative-supervisory patterns . &dquo;…”
Section: An Alternative To Administrator-conducted Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justifying the employment of peercentered systems, Bryant and Haack (1977), stress &dquo;one of the greatest reservoirs for improvement of instruction exists in the competence of excellent teachers in every school building in this nation.&dquo; Lawrence and Branch (1978) advocate peer support as the heart of inservice education; the &dquo;Principals In-Service Program&dquo; developed by /I/D/E/A/ (LaPlant, 1978) based on a collegial-support concept, is being adopted by numerous administrative teams throughout the nation; and, finally, Anderson (1979), reporting on a successful peer supervision program, states: &dquo;it excited and inspired some of us to believe more earnestly in the vitality and promise not only of cooperative staffing patterns but also of cooperative administrative-supervisory patterns . &dquo;…”
Section: An Alternative To Administrator-conducted Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%