2018
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.04228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Review: Toward a Blockchain-enabled Market-based Ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To facilitate the exchange of this type of service, a monetary system of resource credits is created, based on the concept of resource assignment from collaborative cloud services [ 11 ]. This concept of resource trading also appears in other research works ranging from the exchange of energy [ 12 , 13 ] to the exchange of professional services, such as peer reviews [ 14 ], in the academic field. All these works define a brokerage trading system that values individual contributions and stores the merit accumulated by these users.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To facilitate the exchange of this type of service, a monetary system of resource credits is created, based on the concept of resource assignment from collaborative cloud services [ 11 ]. This concept of resource trading also appears in other research works ranging from the exchange of energy [ 12 , 13 ] to the exchange of professional services, such as peer reviews [ 14 ], in the academic field. All these works define a brokerage trading system that values individual contributions and stores the merit accumulated by these users.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Such lack of transparency can lead to a loss of trust. In that regard, several researchers see potential in the BT to improve and open up the peer-review process (Spearpoint, 2017;Tennant et al, 2017;Avital, 2018;Jan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that the technology can enhance the quality and responsiveness of the review process. Both Avital (2018) and Spearpoint (2017), are independently underpinning these statements by proposing two different blockchain-based systems that use monetary incentives along with new metrics to address inefficiencies of the review process. Jan et al (2018) are also sharing the opinion and utilized BT and SCs to develop a peer-review prototype.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution to a token-based peer-review payment system in Information System journals is proposed in [34]. It appears as an opportunity to address the archaic peer-review process currently installed and as a way to address the "tragedy of the commons" that reflects the limited capacity of academic peer-review, in an era of rising demand for reviewers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, while YABW is a common example of an application for Blockchain 1.0, the works described in [34][35][36] are evidence of Blockchain 2.0 and good entry points into Blockchain 3.0. As a matter of fact, adopting the usage of smart contracts as described by Diaz et al allows organizations to be autonomous based on the autoexecution of code.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%