A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science

Abstract

Many sectors, like finance, medicine, manufacturing, and education, use blockchain applications to profit from the unique bundle of characteristics of this technology. Blockchain technology (BT) promises benefits in trustability, collaboration, organization, identification, credibility, and transparency. In this paper, we conduct an analysis in which we show how open science can benefit from this technology and its properties. For this, we determined the requirements of an open science ecosystem and compared them with the characteristics of BT to prove that the technology suits as an infrastructure. We also review literature and promising blockchain-based projects for open science to describe the current research situation. To this end, we examine the projects in particular for their relevance and contribution to open science and categorize them afterwards according to their primary purpose. Several of them already provide functionalities that can have a positive impact on current research workflows. So, BT offers promising possibilities for its use in science, but why is it then not used on a large-scale in that area? To answer this question, we point out various shortcomings, challenges, unanswered questions, and research potentials that we found in the literature and identified during our analysis. These topics shall serve as starting points for future research to foster the BT for open science and beyond, especially in the long-term.

Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study

“…Scholars have recently highlighted the value of digital information technologies and SC digital twins to manage disruption risks ( Ivanov and Dolgui, 2020b ). A new promising digital technology that proves to be particularly helpful in the field of transparent, secure, and efficient collaboration is blockchain technology (BCT) ( Leible et al, 2019 ). According to a study by KPMG in 2019, 48% of the 740 global technology leaders surveyed believe that BCT is likely or very likely to change their business in three years ( KPMG, 2019 ).…”

A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship

“…Such transparency, in theory, also facilitates more productive criticism, evaluation, and diversity in forms of peer review. As such, this element of Open Scholarship has many parallels to the latter development of the FOSS movement (David 2008;Vermeir and Margócsy 2012;Lahti et al 2017 (Leible et al 2019) . Several studies over the years have attempted to understand what motivates individuals to contribute to FOSS.…”

Beyond a Dream: The Practical Foundations of Disconnected Psychology

“…Several blockchain-based publishing repositories have also recently been proposed (e.g. Leible, Schlager, Schubotz, & Gipp, 2019;Stojmenova Duh et al, 2019). A disconnected psychologist would upload their publication to the platform, which would count as publishing, and this is when the ongoing public peer review process would start.…”