1998
DOI: 10.1080/0141192980240205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Education: the unauthorised version

Abstract: Peer education — where people are equipped to educate their contemporaries — is an increasingly popular strategy amongst providers of personal and health education in the UK, especially amongst those who work with teenagers and young adults. This article takes an irreverent look at the premises on which peer education has been founded and considers whether the approach is the panacea that so many claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
10

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than having their identities hinge around social class, gender or race, there is both scope and willingness to exercise personal choice in terms of self identity. Likewise, peer group in uence -once regarded as a major formative in uence on young people's actions and identities -now appears to have markedly less effect as greater emphasis gets placed on individual responsibility for decisions affecting 'who I am' and 'what I stand for' (Michell 1997;Frankham 1998;Parker et al 1998;Denscombe 2000).This does not imply that 'structural' factors cease to exert any in uence at all, but it does mean that there is a tendency for them to exert less in uence that in the past and for greater signi cance to attach to individual choices in terms of the creation of self-identities (Furlong and Cartmel 1997;Pavis et al 1998).…”
Section: Uncertain Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rather than having their identities hinge around social class, gender or race, there is both scope and willingness to exercise personal choice in terms of self identity. Likewise, peer group in uence -once regarded as a major formative in uence on young people's actions and identities -now appears to have markedly less effect as greater emphasis gets placed on individual responsibility for decisions affecting 'who I am' and 'what I stand for' (Michell 1997;Frankham 1998;Parker et al 1998;Denscombe 2000).This does not imply that 'structural' factors cease to exert any in uence at all, but it does mean that there is a tendency for them to exert less in uence that in the past and for greater signi cance to attach to individual choices in terms of the creation of self-identities (Furlong and Cartmel 1997;Pavis et al 1998).…”
Section: Uncertain Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The outcomes are acknowledged to be 'generally modest' (ibid., p. 345). On the basis of previous work (Frankham, 1998), we suggest this may be explained by the similarities between the 'intervention' and the 'control' approaches to sex education in terms of objectives and content-protection from unwanted pregnancy and STIs predominates (Stephenson et al, 2004, p. 339). These sessions may have been peer-'delivered', but they were designed by adults, with adult concerns in mind.…”
Section: Number-bendingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Peer leaders have intrinsic credibility and ability to tailor the discussion with relevant examples [19]. They also promote a sense of shared norms and social support [20].…”
Section: Action Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%