2007
DOI: 10.1080/02680930601158968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex, science and educational research: the unholy trinity1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irigaray notes this tendency: “the exploitation of women’s bodies by the pornographic media (1994 [1989], x).” British media adopt this kind of morally split discourse, typically in relation to topics like sexual assault, the “pregnant teenager,” or the “great paedophile panic” (Hoggart 2007). In such discourses, “purity and impurity must simultaneously contest each other” (Stronach, Frankham, and Stark 2007, 220). The “problem” of touch originates and is promoted in such a perverse circulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irigaray notes this tendency: “the exploitation of women’s bodies by the pornographic media (1994 [1989], x).” British media adopt this kind of morally split discourse, typically in relation to topics like sexual assault, the “pregnant teenager,” or the “great paedophile panic” (Hoggart 2007). In such discourses, “purity and impurity must simultaneously contest each other” (Stronach, Frankham, and Stark 2007, 220). The “problem” of touch originates and is promoted in such a perverse circulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%