2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00082-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-attributed prosocial behavior among aggressive/preferred, aggressive/non-preferred, non-aggressive/preferred and non-aggressive/non-preferred adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this sample, girls were perceived by mothers as more socially competent than boys. This finding corroborates evidence from research findings suggesting that girls are more helpful (Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Järvinen, 2001), show higher levels of empathy (Fox, Gibbs, & Auerbach, 1985), and have better skills to demonstrate social competence. These reported perceptions may reflect societal expectations.…”
Section: Differences Between Kindergarten Children's Individual and Ssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For this sample, girls were perceived by mothers as more socially competent than boys. This finding corroborates evidence from research findings suggesting that girls are more helpful (Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Järvinen, 2001), show higher levels of empathy (Fox, Gibbs, & Auerbach, 1985), and have better skills to demonstrate social competence. These reported perceptions may reflect societal expectations.…”
Section: Differences Between Kindergarten Children's Individual and Ssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Support for this is found in research showing that outsider behavior (i.e., staying away from aggressive situations) is negatively correlated with psychological mindedness (Sutton et al, 1999). This is consistent with research indicating that some conflict-avoiding youth, although not the most socially preferred among peers, were viewed as being relatively prosocial (Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Järvinen, 2001). In some studies, children who are neither highly aggressive nor highly prosocial are excluded from primary analyses (e.g., Gasser & Keller, 2009).…”
Section: Avoiding Confl Ictsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A child who engages in socially desirable behaviour may receive more positive feedback and attention which may facilitate positive school adjustment. Alternatively, the relationship between trustworthiness and school adjustment may have emerged because trustworthiness is an indicator of prosocial behaviour (Pakaslahti & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, 2001) and prosocial behaviour is predictive of academic performance (Welsh, Parke, Widaman, & O'Neil, 2001). Future research could examine these hypothesized mediators to further investigate the mechanisms responsible for the relationship between young children's peer-reported trustworthiness and school adjustment.…”
Section: Peer-reported Trustworthiness and School Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%