2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective

Abstract: Peer assessment is an important component of a more participatory culture of learning. The articles collected in this special issue constitute a representative kaleidoscope of current research on peer assessment. In this commentary, we argue that research on peer assessment is currently in a stage of adolescence, grappling with the developmental tasks of identity formation and affiliation. Identity formation may be achieved by efforts towards a shared terminology and joint theory building, whereas affiliation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
92
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Their good understanding on what and how to use self and peer assessment provoked the student teachers to make more effort to apply them (Rolheiser & Ross, 2005), build positive learning atmosphere among peers, which make them learn how to see strengths and weaknesses (Kollar & Fischer, 2010), and be aware of what they mastered and did not master (McMillan & Hearn, 2008;Nortcliffe, 2012;Marhaeni & Artini, 2015). This result emphasises Ross (2006), Willey & Gardner (2009), Azarnoosh (2013, Sharma et al (2016), and Li & Chen (2016) that the accurate implementation of self and peer assessment is able to enhance students' enthusiasm, motivation and confidence to learn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their good understanding on what and how to use self and peer assessment provoked the student teachers to make more effort to apply them (Rolheiser & Ross, 2005), build positive learning atmosphere among peers, which make them learn how to see strengths and weaknesses (Kollar & Fischer, 2010), and be aware of what they mastered and did not master (McMillan & Hearn, 2008;Nortcliffe, 2012;Marhaeni & Artini, 2015). This result emphasises Ross (2006), Willey & Gardner (2009), Azarnoosh (2013, Sharma et al (2016), and Li & Chen (2016) that the accurate implementation of self and peer assessment is able to enhance students' enthusiasm, motivation and confidence to learn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working in cooperation can encourage the students to be more interactive to share what they understand or do not yet understand, what they obtain what they do not. This peer interaction can encourage them to learn from one another to get higher grade or improve achievement (Kollar & Fischer, 2010). It can increase enthusiasm in learning, so that they are able to develop academically, cognitively and emotionally (Vickerman, 2009).…”
Section: Self and Peer Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…학생들은 동료에게 즉각적인 피드백을 제공하면서 논의의 질을 판단하는 능력을 향상시킬 수 있으며 (Larson, Britt, & Kurby, 2009), 학습 내용에 대해 서로 의견을 교환하는 일련의 동료평 가 활동을 통해 협력학습을 격려할 수 있다 (Spiller, 2009). 즉, 동료평 가 활동은 학습에서 학생들의 참여 문화를 촉진시키는 중요한 요소이 다 (Kollar & Fischer, 2012 (Nam et al, 2008). 이 프로그램은 의문 만들기, 실험설계 및 수행, 관찰, 주장과 증거, 읽기, 반성하기의 6단계로 구성되어 있다 (Keys et al, 1999;Nam et al, 2008 Ⅲ.…”
Section: 학습에서 학생들의 참여를 높이는 방법 중 하나는 평가 활동에 학생unclassified
“…논의 활동에서 동료평가는 2명 이상의 학생 사이에서 일어나는 협력적 활동이므로 학습 내용에 대해 서로 피드백을 제공하는 과정을 통해 학습을 향상시킬 수 있으 며 (Kollar & Fischer, 2012;Spiller, 2009), 동료들에게 즉각적인 피드 백을 제공하면서 논의의 질을 판단하는 능력을 향상시킬 수 있다 (Larson, Britt & Kurby, 2009). 또한 자기평가활동을 통해 학생들은 자신이 알고 있는 것에 대해 점검하고 평가하는 메타인지능력을 향상 시킬 수 있다 (Biggs & Moore, 1993;Boud & Falchikov, 2007).…”
unclassified
“…또한 자기평가활동을 통해 학생들은 자신이 알고 있는 것에 대해 점검하고 평가하는 메타인지능력을 향상 시킬 수 있다 (Biggs & Moore, 1993;Boud & Falchikov, 2007). 이처 럼 논의 활동에서도 피드백 및 평가의 기회를 학생들에게 제공하는 학생 평가활동은 학생의 참여 문화를 촉진시킬 수 있다 (Kollar & Fischer, 2012).…”
unclassified