Objective
Examine parental perspectives/rankings of the most important weight-management clinical practices; and, determine whether preferences/rankings differ when parents disagree that their child is overweight.
Methods
Mixed-methods analysis of a 32-question survey of parents of 2-18 year-old overweight children assessing parental agreement that their child is overweight, the single most important thing providers can do to improve weight status, ranking AAP-recommended clinical practices, and preferred follow-up interval. Four independent reviewers analyzed open-response data to identify qualitative themes/subthemes. Multivariable analyses examined parental rankings, preferred follow-up interval, and differences by agreement with their child’s overweight assessment.
Results
Thirty-six percent of 219 children were overweight, 42% were obese, and 22% severely obese; 16% of parents disagreed with their child’s overweight assessment. Qualitative analysis of the most important practice to help overweight children yielded 10 themes; unique to parents disagreeing with their children’s overweight assessments was, “change weight-status assessments.” After adjustment, the three highest-ranked clinical practices included, “check for weight-related problems,” “review growth chart,” and “recommend general dietary changes” (all P<.01);” parents disagreeing with their children’s overweight assessments ranked “review growth chart” as less important, and “reducing screen time” and “general activity changes” as more important. The mean preferred weight-management follow-up interval (10-12 weeks) did not differ by agreement with children’s overweight assessments.
Conclusions
Parents prefer weight-management strategies that prioritize evaluating weight-related problems, growth-chart review, and regular follow-up. Parents who disagree that their child is overweight want changes in how overweight is assessed. Using parent-preferred weight-management strategies may prove useful in improving child weight status.