Objective Examine parental perspectives/rankings of the most important weight-management clinical practices; and, determine whether preferences/rankings differ when parents disagree that their child is overweight. Methods Mixed-methods analysis of a 32-question survey of parents of 2-18 year-old overweight children assessing parental agreement that their child is overweight, the single most important thing providers can do to improve weight status, ranking AAP-recommended clinical practices, and preferred follow-up interval. Four independent reviewers analyzed open-response data to identify qualitative themes/subthemes. Multivariable analyses examined parental rankings, preferred follow-up interval, and differences by agreement with their child’s overweight assessment. Results Thirty-six percent of 219 children were overweight, 42% were obese, and 22% severely obese; 16% of parents disagreed with their child’s overweight assessment. Qualitative analysis of the most important practice to help overweight children yielded 10 themes; unique to parents disagreeing with their children’s overweight assessments was, “change weight-status assessments.” After adjustment, the three highest-ranked clinical practices included, “check for weight-related problems,” “review growth chart,” and “recommend general dietary changes” (all P<.01);” parents disagreeing with their children’s overweight assessments ranked “review growth chart” as less important, and “reducing screen time” and “general activity changes” as more important. The mean preferred weight-management follow-up interval (10-12 weeks) did not differ by agreement with children’s overweight assessments. Conclusions Parents prefer weight-management strategies that prioritize evaluating weight-related problems, growth-chart review, and regular follow-up. Parents who disagree that their child is overweight want changes in how overweight is assessed. Using parent-preferred weight-management strategies may prove useful in improving child weight status.
Summary Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether parental preferences regarding primary care weight-management strategies differ by child age, gender, overweight severity, race/ethnicity or parental agreement that their child is overweight. Methods A survey was administered to parents of 2- to 18-year-old children who are overweight at an academic primary-care clinic regarding perception of child overweight, helpful/harmfulness of having the child present during weight discussions, and dietary-advice preferences. Multivariable analyses examined factors associated with preferred weight-management strategies, after adjustment for parent/child characteristics. Results Eighty-three per cent of parents agreed that a child’s presence during weight discussions is helpful/very helpful, 74% that paediatricians should prescribe specific diets, and 55% preferred specific vs. general dietary advice only (N = 219). In multivariable analyses, characteristics associated with helpfulness of child presence included older child age (vs. 2–5 year olds, 6–11 year olds: odds ratio [OR], 4.6; 95% CI, 1.3–16; 12- to 18-year-olds: OR, 23; 95% CI, 4–136), male gender (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.7–10) and obesity (vs. overweight: OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7–12). Characteristics associated with preferring specific diets included Latino race/ethnicity (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3–12), older age (vs. 2–5 year olds, 6–11 year olds: OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1–7; 12–18 year olds: OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5–10) and agreement that the child is overweight (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1–5) and, for specific dietary advice, older age (vs. 2–5 year olds: OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1–5) and agreement that the child is overweight (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2–4). Conclusions Findings suggest that weight-management strategies tailored to child age, gender, over-weight severity, race/ethnicity and parental agreement that their child is overweight may prove useful in improving child weight status.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.