2021
DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Simple Knee Value: A simple patient-reported outcome measure for the knee

Abstract: Purpose The pediatric Simple Knee Value (pedi-SKV) is an outcome score in which paediatric patients are asked ‘How would you rate your knee today as a percentage of normal (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal)?’. The primary aim of this study was to validate the pedi-SKV by measuring its correlation with validated knee function scores used most often in paediatric orthopaedics. Methods This prospective study was conducted at a teaching hospital to evaluate the pedi-SKV’s validity. A total of 44 paediatric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although the IKDC/Pedi-IKDC and SANE do not assess constructs identical to ACL-RSI (self-reported function vs confidence), these questionnaires have been validated in this population, and self-reported confidence can be expected to moderately or strongly correlate with self-reported function. 8,10,17 Third, a small subset of patients received the IKDC instead of the Pedi-IKDC because they were >18 years at the time of RTS testing. However, these patients were 18 or younger at the time of surgery and were included in the analysis given previous work indicating the strong positive correlation between the Pedi-IKDC and IKDC in adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the IKDC/Pedi-IKDC and SANE do not assess constructs identical to ACL-RSI (self-reported function vs confidence), these questionnaires have been validated in this population, and self-reported confidence can be expected to moderately or strongly correlate with self-reported function. 8,10,17 Third, a small subset of patients received the IKDC instead of the Pedi-IKDC because they were >18 years at the time of RTS testing. However, these patients were 18 or younger at the time of surgery and were included in the analysis given previous work indicating the strong positive correlation between the Pedi-IKDC and IKDC in adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cultural and linguistic adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC questionnaire for Lithuanian paediatric patients with knee disorders was created and its psychometric properties were evaluated. So far, there are few validated PROMs in orthopaedic and even knee-addressed conditions in children [4,20,25,26,[43][44][45]. The fundamental issue is that many studies do not use appropriate PROMs for children or use them without validation [32,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, van der Velden et al performed a study on the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child scores and determined that Pedi-IKDC had superior psychometric properties, making it a better instrument for evaluating knee function in children [31]. However, separate items of Pedi-IKDC have been criticised [43]. Another significant issue presently is the validation technique, which is not sufficiently standardised and is currently being debated [2,6,33,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the date, Pedi-IKDC is the most studied and should be preferred over other PROMs [11]. However, separate items of Pedi-IKDC have been criticized [24]. For the time being, the Pedi-IKDC is available in English [8] original), Danish [13], Dutch [4], and in Italian language [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%