Background: Comprehensive studies evaluating quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are lacking. The optimal choice of graft between bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and QT is still debatable. Hypothesis: The current literature supports the use of QT as a strong autograft with good outcomes when used in ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ovid databases to identify published articles on clinical studies relevant to ACL reconstruction with QT autograft and studies comparing QT autograft versus BPTB and HT autografts. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of instrumented laxity measurements, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) scores, donor-site pain, and graft failure. Results: Twenty-seven clinical studies including 2856 patients with ACL reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Comparison of 581 QT versus 514 BPTB autografts showed no significant differences in terms of instrumented mean side-to-side difference ( P = .45), Lachman test ( P = .76), pivot-shift test grade 0 ( P = .23), pivot-shift test grade 0 or 1 ( P = .85), mean Lysholm score ( P = .1), mean subjective IKDC score ( P = .36), or graft failure ( P = .50). However, outcomes in favor of QT were found in terms of less donor-site pain (risk ratio for QT vs BPTB groups, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18-0.36; P < .00001). Comparison of 181 QT versus 176 HT autografts showed no significant differences in terms of instrumented mean side-to-side difference ( P = .75), Lachman test ( P = .41), pivot-shift test grade 0 ( P = .53), Lysholm score less than 84 ( P = .53), mean subjective IKDC score ( P = .13), donor-site pain ( P = .40), or graft failure ( P = .46). However, outcomes in favor of QT were found in terms of mean Lysholm score (mean difference between QT and HT groups, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.45-7.17; P = .03). Conclusion: QT autograft had comparable clinical and functional outcomes and graft survival rate compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, QT autograft showed significantly less harvest site pain compared with BPTB autograft and better functional outcome scores compared with HT autograft.

At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, incorporation and ligamentization of the STG and ST4 grafts were the same based on MRI analysis. The results were at least as good with the ST4 technique as with the standard STG technique in terms of incorporation and ligamentization.

Background: It has been shown that adding lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to standard anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction significantly decreases the loads on the ACL composite graft. To date, the possible effect of LET on ACL graft incorporation is not known. Purpose: To compare the incorporation in tibial bone tunnels of a standard quadrupled semitendinosus (ST4) graft to an ST4 graft plus LET at 1 year postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 62 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively: 31 received an ST4 graft, and 31 received an ST4 graft plus LET. Graft incorporation was evaluated with MRI at the 1-year follow-up visit. The following parameters were evaluated: signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ), tibial tunnel widening, graft healing, and graft maturity according to the Howell scale. The primary endpoint was the SNQ of the ST4 graft at 1 year postoperatively; this parameter was adjusted because of unequal baseline characteristics between groups. Clinical and functional outcomes as well as incorporation of the graft were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Results: The mean adjusted SNQ was 0.5 ± 2.1 (95% CI, 0.4-4.6) in the ST4 + LET group and 5.9 ± 3.7 (95% CI, 4.7-7.0) in the ST4 group ( P = .0297). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 73.7% ± 42.2% in the ST4 + LET group versus 77.5% ± 46.7% in the ST4 group ( P = .5685). Howell grade I, indicative of better graft maturity, was statistically more frequent in the ST4 + LET group ( P = .0379). No statistically significant difference was seen between groups in terms of graft healing ( P = .1663). The Lysholm score was statistically higher in the ST4 + LET group ( P = .0058). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score ( P = .2683) or Tegner score ( P = .7428). The mean SNQ of the LET graft at the 1-year follow-up visit was 2.6 ± 4.9. Conclusion: At 1 year postoperatively, the MRI appearance of ACL grafts showed generally better incorporation and maturation when combined with LET.

Purpose The KOOS questionnaire is used to assess the symptoms and function of patients with traumatic or degenerative knee pathology. The WOMAC score has been validated mainly in the context of knee osteoarthritis. The distribution of these scores in a non‐diseased population is not known. The hypothesis was that KOOS and WOMAC scores were influenced by patients’ age, sex, and BMI. The primary objective of this study was to describe, for the first time, the distribution of KOOS and WOMAC scores in a healthy population based on age, sex, and BMI. Methods This was a pilot (innovative), cross‐sectional, international, multicenter, descriptive study. Persons accompanying patients to our clinic were invited to participate in this study by filling out the KOOS questionnaire. These data were also used to calculate the WOMAC score. The study was designed according to guidelines on pilot studies and planned to enroll a minimum of 30 subjects in each age, gender, and BMI group. Expected KOOS and WOMAC scores by age, gender, and BMI were determined using a linear regression model. Results Seven hundred and fourteen subjects were included: 305 men (42.7%) and 409 women (57.3%). For the KOOS score, as age increases, there was a decrease in the “ADL” (p = 0.0001) and “sport” (p = 0.0001) items and an increase in the “symptoms” (p = 0.0025) and “QOL” items (p = 0.0001). Women had lower scores (p < 0.05) than men on all the KOOS items, except “QOL”. For the WOMAC, the “pain”, “stiffness”, and “function” items varied significantly based on age (p = 0.0203) and sex (p = 0.0121). The “stiffness” item varied significantly based on age (p = 0.0005) and sex (p = 0.0477). The “function” item varied significantly based on age (p = 0.0001) and sex (p = 0.0256). The expected value for the KOOS and WOMAC scores in a healthy population without any knee ailments were determined. Conclusions The KOOS and WOMAC scores vary significantly based on age, sex, and BMI in a healthy population. This study also provides KOOS and WOMAC values in a population without any knee issue. These scores can be used, in a daily practice, as a reference to assess functional outcomes after a surgical procedure. Level of evidence IV.

4.

PurposeThe primary objective was to compare the functional outcomes after an isolated MPFL reconstruction using either a quasi‐anatomical technique (group A) or an anatomical MPFL reconstruction (group B). The secondary objectives were to compare the rates of redislocation, range‐of‐motion and subjective patellar instability (Smillie test). MethodsA multicenter longitudinal prospective comparative study was performed. Group A had 29 patients and 28 were included in Group B. Patients with trochlear dysplasia types C and D and patients who had undergone a trochleoplasty, a distal realignment or patella distalization concurrently with MPFL reconstruction were excluded. The main evaluation criterion was the Kujala functional score. ResultsThe mean postoperative Kujala was 90.4 (89.4 in group A and 92.1 in group B). Upon comparing the mean difference between pre‐ and post‐operative values, no differences were detected between the two groups (n.s). ConclusionsIsolated quasi‐anatomical MPFL reconstruction using a gracilis tendon autograft for recurrent patellar dislocation provides outcomes as good as the isolated anatomical MPFL reconstruction in patients with no trochlear dysplasia up to those with trochlear dysplasia type A and B at the 2–5 years follow‐up. Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Background: Medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL), lateral meniscus root tear (LMRT), and anterolateral ligament (ALL) tear are individual injuries that have been described in patients who have an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. However, the prevalence of these lesions and their combination has not been defined. Purposes: To define the individual and combined prevalence of MMRL, LMRT, and ALL tears in a case series of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and to identify the risk factors for combined injuries. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients aged >15 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between January 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled in the study. A preoperative ultrasound scan was performed to look for an ALL tear. The presence of MMRL and LMRT was determined during a standardized arthroscopy exploration. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the individual effect of patient variables on the risk of associated single, dual, triad, or tetrad injuries (MMRL, LMRT, ALL, ACL), represented by an adjusted odds ratio. Results: The case series consisted of 602 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. An isolated ACL injury was present in 147 patients (24%). A dual injury was detected in 34 patients (6%) who had ACL-MMRL, 16 (2.65%) who had ACL-LMRT, and 265 (44%) who had ACL-ALL. A triad injury was detected in 80 patients (13.28%) who had ACL-ALL-MMRL, 36 (6%) who had ACL-ALL-LMRT, and 3 (0.5%) who had ACL-MMRL-LMRT. A tetrad injury pattern was detected in 21 patients (3.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that the occurrence of tetrad injury was significantly lower in older patients (adjusted odds ratio by year, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]; P = .028). Identifying LMRT increased the likelihood of finding MMRL-ALL injuries by 2.11 times (95% CI, 1.09-3.12; P = .031). Conclusion: Isolated ACL tear is less common than combined injuries, which are quite frequent. Younger age is a risk factor for combined injuries. The search for damaged secondary stabilizers of the knee must be meticulous and systematic, especially when 1 injured structure has already been diagnosed.

PurposeSome researchers have suggested that bone bruises are evidence of rotational instability. The hypothesis was that the extent of lateral bone edema is correlated with the presence of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury. The main objective was to determine whether there was a correlation between the presence of an ALL injury the extent of bone bruises. MethodsA prospective diagnostic study enrolled all the patients who suffered an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) who were operated on within 8 weeks. The extent of bone bruising according to the ICRS classification was measured on preoperative MRIs by two independent blinded raters twice with an interval of 4 weeks. Dynamic ultrasonography (US) to look for ALL injury and the pivot shift test were performed before the ACL surgery. The correlation between ALL injury and bone bruises, and the correlation between an ALL injury and a high‐grade pivot shift test were determined. ResultsSixty‐one patients were included; 52% of patients had an ALL injury on US. The extent of lateral bone bruise was not related to the presence of an ALL injury, nor related to the presence of a high‐grade pivot shift. A grade 2 or 3 pivot shift was significantly correlated with an ALL injury (p < 0.0001). Inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability for the bone bruise rating was excellent. ConclusionThe extent of lateral bone bruise is not correlated with ALL injury or a high‐grade pivot shift; thus, it is not correlated with rotational instability of the knee. Level of evidenceII.