2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric MDCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the maximum diagnostic accuracy in this study (AUC $ 0.94 6 0.04) was close to but slightly lower than that in our pilot study 11 (AUC $ 0.95 6 0.02), which had a similar study design. This slight decrease in performance may be explained by the fact that the nodules in this study had slightly lower contrast (200-500 HU) than those in the pilot study (250-550 HU).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the maximum diagnostic accuracy in this study (AUC $ 0.94 6 0.04) was close to but slightly lower than that in our pilot study 11 (AUC $ 0.95 6 0.02), which had a similar study design. This slight decrease in performance may be explained by the fact that the nodules in this study had slightly lower contrast (200-500 HU) than those in the pilot study (250-550 HU).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We have previously evaluated and calibrated the accuracy of this software. 11 We showed that the texture (spatial correlation properties) of the simulated noise matches very well with that of the real noise. However, discrepancies existed between the magnitudes of the simulated and real noise.…”
Section: Iib Noise Simulation and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Along this same line, it is possible to use computer simulations to fuse real patient CT data with simulated data, resulting in so-called ‘hybrid’ CT images. Li et al and Solomon et al both generated hybrid images by inserting virtual lesion models into reconstructed CT images (Li et al 2009, Solomon and Samei 2014). Although those image based insertion methods produced realistic results they may not be valid to properly assess the impact of reconstruction on nodule volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%