Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of spectral imaging using photon-counting detector (PCD) x-ray computed tomography (CT) for simultaneous material decomposition of 3 contrast agents in vivo in a large animal model. Methods This Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved study used a canine model. Bismuth subsalicylate was administered orally 24–72 hours before imaging. PCD CT was performed during intravenous administration of 40–60 ml gadoterate meglumine; 3.5 minutes later, iopamidol 370 was injected intravenously. Renal PCD CT images were acquired every 2 seconds for 5–6 minutes to capture the wash-in and wash-out kinetics of the contrast agents. Least mean squares linear material decomposition was used to calculate the concentrations of contrast agents in the aorta, renal cortex, renal medulla and renal pelvis. Results Using reference vials with known concentrations of materials, we computed molar concentrations of the various contrast agents during each phase of CT scanning. Material concentration maps allowed simultaneous quantification of both arterial and delayed renal enhancement in a single CT acquisition. The accuracy of the material decomposition algorithm in a test phantom was −0.4±2.2 mM, 0.3±2.2 mM for iodine and gadolinium solutions, respectively. Peak contrast concentration of gadolinium and iodine in the aorta, renal cortex, and renal medulla were observed 16, 24, and 60 seconds after the start each injection, respectively. Conclusion Photon-counting spectral CT allowed simultaneous material decomposition of multiple contrast agents in vivo. Besides defining contrast agent concentrations, tissue enhancement at multiple phases was observed in a single CT acquisition, potentially obviating the need for multi-phase CT scans and thus reducing radiation dose.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using a whole-body photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner for low dose lung cancer screening compared to a conventional energy integrating detector (EID) system. Materials and Methods Radiation dose-matched EID and PCD scans of the COPDGene 2 phantom were acquired at different radiation dose levels (CTDIvol: 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mGy) and different tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kVp). EID and PCD images were compared for quantitative Hounsfield unit accuracy, noise levels, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for detection of ground-glass nodules (GGN) and emphysema. Results The PCD Hounsfield unit accuracy was better than EID for water at all scan parameters. PCD HU stability for lung, GGN and emphysema regions were superior to EID and PCD attenuation values were more reproducible than EID for all scan parameters (all P<0.01), while Hounsfield units for lung, GGN and emphysema ROIs changed significantly for EID with decreasing dose (all P<0.001). PCD showed lower noise levels at the lowest dose setting at 120, 100 and 80 kVp (15.2±0.3 HU vs 15.8±0.2 HU, P=0.03; 16.1±0.3 HU vs 18.0±0.4 HU, P=0.003; and 16.1±0.3 HU vs 17.9±0.3 HU, P=0.001, respectively), resulting in superior CNR for evaluation of GGNs and emphysema at 100 and 80 kVp. Conclusion PCD provided better Hounsfield unit stability for lung, ground-glass, and emphysemaequivalent foams at lower radiation dose settings with better reproducibility than EID. Additionally, PCD showed up to 10% less noise, and 11% higher CNR at 0.75 mGy for both 100 and 80 kVp. PCD technology may help reduce radiation exposure in lung cancer screening while maintaining diagnostic quality.
Purpose To estimate the radiation dose as a result of contrast medium administration in a typical abdominal computed tomographic (CT) examination across a library of contrast material-enhanced computational patient models. Materials and Methods In part II of this study, first, the technique described in part I of this study was applied to enhance the extended cardiac-torso models with patient-specific iodine-time profiles reflecting the administration of contrast material. Second, the patient models were deployed to assess the patient-specific organ dose as a function of time in a typical abdominal CT examination using Monte Carlo simulation. In this hypothesis-generating study, organ dose refers to the total energy deposited in the unit mass of the tissue inclusive of iodine. Third, a study was performed as a strategy to anticipate the biologically relevant dose (absorbed dose to tissue) in highly perfused organs such as the liver and kidney. The time-varying organ-dose increment values relative to those for unenhanced CT examinations were reported. Results The results from the patient models subjected to the injection protocol indicated up to a total 53%, 30%, 35%, 54%, 27%, 18%, 17%, and 24% increase in radiation dose delivered to the heart, spleen, liver, kidneys, stomach, colon, small intestine, and pancreas, respectively. The biologically relevant dose increase with respect to the dose at an unenhanced CT examination was in the range of 0%-18% increase for the liver and 27% for the kidney across 58 patient models. Conclusion The administration of contrast medium increases the total radiation dose. However, radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, may still not fully characterize the total biologic effects. Therefore, given the fact that many CT diagnostic decisions would be impossible without the use of iodine, this study suggests the need to consider the effect of iodinated contrast material on the organ doses to patients undergoing CT studies when designing CT protocols. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.