2021
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peanut response to co‐inoculation of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense and molybdenum application in sandy soil of the Brazilian Cerrado

Abstract: The use of plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) associated with rhizobia may improve biological N fixation, nutrient acquisition, and grain yield of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). However, few studies have reported the effect of inoculation of rhizobia and PGPR in association with Mo in tropical soil conditions. This study examined the effectiveness of (co)inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and/or Azospirillum brasilense and Mo application in improving the yield response of creeping peanut crop (‘R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of sustainable management practices, such as combining different functionalities of promising microorganisms through co‐inoculation, can result in high yields and profitability of agricultural activities (Steiner et al., 2021). Our results show that despite increasing production costs, soybean co‐inoculation provided increases of up to 15.6% in the conventional system (2020) and 21.2% in no‐tillage (2021) in farmers’ profits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of sustainable management practices, such as combining different functionalities of promising microorganisms through co‐inoculation, can result in high yields and profitability of agricultural activities (Steiner et al., 2021). Our results show that despite increasing production costs, soybean co‐inoculation provided increases of up to 15.6% in the conventional system (2020) and 21.2% in no‐tillage (2021) in farmers’ profits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although nitrates in sap did not reflect a significance with p < 0.05 in the interaction of factors, an effect was identified from proteins in the root and stem, while for lipids the effect was found in the root, stem and leaves (Figure 2 a-e), identifying that, in chlorophyll "b", this interaction was favored for Ab + M40 (Figure 2c). These results can be attributed to the fact that Ab, as a PGPB, tends to make photosynthetic activity more efficient, as well as the chlorophyll content, due to the high levels of CO 2 uptake; therefore, there is a greater accumulation of sugars in the fruits [55][56][57]. The nitrate content in Ab + M (40, 80, 120 and 160) and A + CHF plants for all treatments was very high (without significance) with respect to the plants that were not inoculated with the N 2 -fixing bacteria used in this studio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%