1967
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1002.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak Intraoral Air Pressures During Speech

Abstract: Peak intraoral air pressures were recorded during speech acts of ten children and ten adults by use of a polyethylene tube positioned in the oral-pharyngeal cavity. These pressures were measured during selected consonants spoken under a variety of conditions. Air pressures for voiceless consonants were found to be significantly higher than for voiced consonants, and higher peak intraoral air pressures were associated with stop consonants than with continuant consonants. For adults, successively higher magnitud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lucero and Koenig (2005) recently observed that scaling a laryngeal model down to a size appropriate for a 5 year old increased the phonation threshold pressure, as a result of less glottal tissue area absorbing the aerodynamic energy that fuels oscillation. Several past studies have found higher subglottal pressures in children compared to adults (Arkebauer et al, 1967;Bernthal and Beukelman, 1978;Brown, 1979;Netsell et al, 1994;Stathopoulos and Sapienza, 1993;Stathopoulos and Weismer, 1985;Subtelny et al, 1966). Some researchers have pointed out that the increased resistance afforded by children's smaller airways will, all else being equal, lead to higher pressures (Stathopoulos and Sapienza, 1993;Stathopoulos and Weismer, 1985).…”
Section: Child-adult Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lucero and Koenig (2005) recently observed that scaling a laryngeal model down to a size appropriate for a 5 year old increased the phonation threshold pressure, as a result of less glottal tissue area absorbing the aerodynamic energy that fuels oscillation. Several past studies have found higher subglottal pressures in children compared to adults (Arkebauer et al, 1967;Bernthal and Beukelman, 1978;Brown, 1979;Netsell et al, 1994;Stathopoulos and Sapienza, 1993;Stathopoulos and Weismer, 1985;Subtelny et al, 1966). Some researchers have pointed out that the increased resistance afforded by children's smaller airways will, all else being equal, lead to higher pressures (Stathopoulos and Sapienza, 1993;Stathopoulos and Weismer, 1985).…”
Section: Child-adult Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past work has established that children as young as 4 years of age, like adults, produce higher peak P io in voiceless stops than in voiced (Arkebauer et al, 1967;Bernthal and Beukelman, 1978;Brown, 1979;Lisker, 1970;Malécot, 1966;Miller and Daniloff, 1977;Stathopoulos and Weismer, 1985;Subtelny et al, 1966;Warren and Hall, 1973), thereby demonstrating some aerodynamic differentiation of consonants according to voicing category. At the same time, previous authors (particularly Kewley-Port and Preston, 1974) have attributed limited closure voicing in young children to immature control over intraoral pressure, and Müller and Brown (1980) specifically suggested that P io might rise faster in children than adults.…”
Section: B Quantitative Pressure Pulse Analysis and Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that in general, peak intraoral pressure increased as the articulatory placement moved from bilabial to dental and palatal. However, Arkebauer et al [30] reported that in normal children the mean peak Po was greater for /t/ than for /p/ in both intervocalic and postvocalic phonetic contexts, but it was lower than for /p/ in the prevocalic contexts. Subtelny et al [31] also reported that the mean magnitudes of Po for intervocalic /p/ and /t/ was 6.43 and 6.18 cm H 2 O, respectively, for male speakers and 7.52 and 7.44 cm H 2 O, respectively, for female speakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P 0 is greater for voiceless than voiced cognate pairs. 3,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The degree of P 0 produced in the oral cavity is also dependent on the consonant itself. reported data acquired during a syllable repetition task from young (n = 20) and elderly (n = 21) male and female adults.…”
Section: Effect Of Age Gender and Repeated Measures On Intraoral Aimentioning
confidence: 99%