2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR versus culture in the detection of vaginalUreaplasma urealyticumandMycoplasma hominis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Over recent years, PCR has gained in popularity as a method for finding all genital mycoplasmas in research settings and seems to be more reliable. For example, Petrikkos and colleagues [4] examined vaginal specimens collected from 203 asymptomatic women in Greece. When culture was used as the reference standard, they found that the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for the detection of U. urealyticum were 94.2% and 92% and for M. hominis were 95.6% and 86.9%.…”
Section: Detection Of Genital Mycoplasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years, PCR has gained in popularity as a method for finding all genital mycoplasmas in research settings and seems to be more reliable. For example, Petrikkos and colleagues [4] examined vaginal specimens collected from 203 asymptomatic women in Greece. When culture was used as the reference standard, they found that the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for the detection of U. urealyticum were 94.2% and 92% and for M. hominis were 95.6% and 86.9%.…”
Section: Detection Of Genital Mycoplasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 There are some data that NAATs may be more sensitive than standard culture (sensitivity = 92.4%, specificity = 94.8% in one study of vaginal specimens). 15 Given the significant incidence of Ureaplasma as etiology for NGU and the significance of extragenital STIs in MSM, further research on the value of screening for urethral and rectal Ureaplasma infections in YMSM is merited, especially for those engaging in condomless anal intercourse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then PCR methods have been increasingly used in the diagnosis of Ureaplasma infections and in the study of this pathogen. PCR methods have advantages over traditional culture methods: organism identification can occur even if the numbers of bacteria are low, viability is not necessary, and rapid identification within 24 h is possible [29]. Subtyping of isolates can be performed faster with PCR methods (24-48 h after sample collection) than with culture methods [13].…”
Section: Diagnosticmentioning
confidence: 99%