2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pay for politicians and candidate selection: An empirical analysis

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From a normative perspective, a positive PWG could be beneficial for society if it attracted more able individuals to run for office and as a consequence yielded a more efficient provision of public goods. Yet, recent theoretical and empirical studies show that higher earnings need not necessarily lead to better politicians (Poutvaara and Takalo, 2007;Kotakorpi and Poutvaara, 2011). We contribute to this result by showing that becoming a politician is financially attractive for the average executive (and even more so for the average citizen) but not for top-level managers and business-owners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…From a normative perspective, a positive PWG could be beneficial for society if it attracted more able individuals to run for office and as a consequence yielded a more efficient provision of public goods. Yet, recent theoretical and empirical studies show that higher earnings need not necessarily lead to better politicians (Poutvaara and Takalo, 2007;Kotakorpi and Poutvaara, 2011). We contribute to this result by showing that becoming a politician is financially attractive for the average executive (and even more so for the average citizen) but not for top-level managers and business-owners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…7 On the empirical part, two studies with similar focus yield the same results: Ferraz and Finan (2009) and Gagliarducci and Nannicini (2011) both estimate positive effects of increased wages on performance and selection-the former for local politicians in Brazil and the latter for Italian mayors. For Finland, Kotakorpi and Poutvaara (2010) find that a policy-induced salary increase among members of parliament raised the average level of education among female candidates but not among males. Finally, Keane and Merlo (2010) use the framework and data from Diermeier et al (2005) to simulate a variety of policy changes and study whether the effects are disproportionate across different types of politicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…There is some evidence showing that positive incentives are associated with the desired positive effects on performance. Kotakorpi and Poutvaara (2011) show that a salary increase in Finland drew more skilled representatives into parliament, but have no evidence on actual performance. For Italy, on the other hand, Gagliarducci & Nannicini (2013) 47 See also the recent survey by Alm (2012) for a broad overview on the empirical literature on tax evasion and its determinants, which generally supports the theoretical relationships discussed here.…”
Section: Incentives and Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 89%