2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00490.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pay Enough, Don't Pay Too Much or Don't Pay at All? The Impact of Bonus Intensity on Job Satisfaction

Abstract: Using ten waves (1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007) of the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), this paper investigates the ceteris paribus association between the intensity of incentive pay, the dynamic change in bonus status and the utility derived from work. After controlling for individual heterogeneity biases, it is shown that job utility rises only in response to "generous" bonus payments, primarily in skilled, non-unionized, private sector jobs. Revoking a bonus from one year … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In particular, a 1 percentage point increase in the average intensity of PRP per establishment is found to be associated with a 14 percentage point decrease on mean absence. This result closely resembles those of Gneezy and Rustichini (2000) and Pouliakas (2010) who have shown that a higher intensity of incentive pay is associated with greater job satisfaction and intrinsic motivation among employees. 21 An alternative yet more arbitrary specification has also been utilized, whereby the continuous PRP intensity variable has been separated into a number of indicator dummies (e.g.…”
Section: Effect Of Proportion Of Prp Tied To Earnings: Ashe-wers Datasupporting
confidence: 72%
“…21 In particular, a 1 percentage point increase in the average intensity of PRP per establishment is found to be associated with a 14 percentage point decrease on mean absence. This result closely resembles those of Gneezy and Rustichini (2000) and Pouliakas (2010) who have shown that a higher intensity of incentive pay is associated with greater job satisfaction and intrinsic motivation among employees. 21 An alternative yet more arbitrary specification has also been utilized, whereby the continuous PRP intensity variable has been separated into a number of indicator dummies (e.g.…”
Section: Effect Of Proportion Of Prp Tied To Earnings: Ashe-wers Datasupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, this passionate error will develop and aggregate over circumstances along these lines which make employees become unsatisfied working for the association. Pouliakas (2010) found that there is a huge negative relationship between bonus payments and the satisfaction of workers with the actual job itself. Financial motivators positively affect worker's utility and performance.…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of job satisfaction is a popular subject in scientific terms and there are thousands of related studies (Judge, 2000), albeit there is an obscure point. Though the factors (Decker, 1997;Castillo and Cano, 2004), intensity (Fisher, 1998;Pouliakas, 2010), and outcomes (Brown and Peterson, 1993;Hagedorn, 2000) of workers' (Donavan et al, 2004;Borzaga and Tortia, 2006) and managers' (Wells, 1990;Kim and Brymer, 2011) job satisfaction are considered, the nature of business owners' job satisfaction is rather rarely subjected in the literature (Stoner et al, 1990;Boles, 1996), and it is even much rare in the Turkish literature (Ayranci, 2011). Along with this rarity, the literature does not point out a dedicated instrument to measure the extent or the factors of business owners' job satisfaction; hence the authors facilitate from many instruments similar to the approach of Ayranci (2011) in order to find out the factors, upon which job satisfaction of SME owners depend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%