2014
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbu028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of zooplankton population synchrony in a tropical reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of typical distance-decay patterns may be a common feature of synchrony between sites within a single body of freshwater. Other studies of synchrony in one freshwater body have also documented absent or minimal declines across greater distances than ours ( 100 km), as well as generally high levels of spatial synchrony for a variety of taxa (Grenouillet et al 2001, Michaletz and Siepker 2013, Seebens et al 2013, Lodi et al 2014. In contrast, synchrony is typically weaker between pairs of water bodies (Cattanéo et al 2003, Rusak et al 2008, Michaletz and Siepker 2013, and does decline with distance for some taxa (Rogers and Schindler 2008), though such tests are absent from other between-water body comparisons (Cattanéo et al 2003, Rusak et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Absence of typical distance-decay patterns may be a common feature of synchrony between sites within a single body of freshwater. Other studies of synchrony in one freshwater body have also documented absent or minimal declines across greater distances than ours ( 100 km), as well as generally high levels of spatial synchrony for a variety of taxa (Grenouillet et al 2001, Michaletz and Siepker 2013, Seebens et al 2013, Lodi et al 2014. In contrast, synchrony is typically weaker between pairs of water bodies (Cattanéo et al 2003, Rusak et al 2008, Michaletz and Siepker 2013, and does decline with distance for some taxa (Rogers and Schindler 2008), though such tests are absent from other between-water body comparisons (Cattanéo et al 2003, Rusak et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Dispersal as a mechanism of synchrony has typically been less of a focus in between-lake synchrony studies because it is unlikely that synchrony would arise from this mechanism between lakes: dispersal between lakes is probably very limited in numbers of organisms transferred. A few studies have investigated synchrony between different locations within a single water body (Lansac-Tôha et al 2008, Seebens et al 2013, Lodi et al 2014, where dispersal via currents could be more important as a synchronizing agent, though dispersal as a mechanism has only rarely been explicitly investigated or compared to alternative possible mechanisms in any freshwater study (Seebens et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that in terms of effect sizes, the limnological (dis)similarity between sites was a more important predictor of biological synchrony than geographic distance. This is in agreement with a growing number of studies that have indicated the importance of Moran effects as drivers of population synchrony (Fox, Vasseur, Hausch, & Roberts, 2011;Koenig, 2002;Lansac-Tôha et al, 2008;Lodi et al, 2014;Lundberg, Ranta, Ripa, & Kaitala, 2000;Ranta et al, 1999;Sheppard et al, 2016). Interestingly, the matrices of environmental and geographic distances were unrelated to each other.…”
Section: And 2e Fromsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Climatic and hydrological factors have also been recognised as important factors that influence the patterns of the synchrony of plankton populations (Defriez et al, 2016;George, Talling, & Rigg, 2000;Lodi, Velho, Carvalho, & Bini, 2014;Rusak et al, 2008;Xu, Cai, Shao, & Han, 2012). However, these patterns can be strongly influenced by local processes, including variations in limnological characteristics (e.g., Lansac-Tôha et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchrony in freshwater plankton is well studied via distance-decay and correlation approaches (e.g., Rusak et al 1999;Rusak et al 2008;Seebens et al 2013;Lodi et al 2014) which conflate components of synchrony on different timescales ( Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%