2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00027-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
226
1
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
16
226
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies examining patterns of feedback are mainly in the field of second language acquisition (Ashwell 2000;Ferreira, Moore, and Mellish 2007). Future research should investigate alternative methods of understanding the patterns found and why some are more effective than others.…”
Section: Usefulness Of the Teacher Feedback Observation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining patterns of feedback are mainly in the field of second language acquisition (Ashwell 2000;Ferreira, Moore, and Mellish 2007). Future research should investigate alternative methods of understanding the patterns found and why some are more effective than others.…”
Section: Usefulness Of the Teacher Feedback Observation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of WCF has, again, been reported by some other studies (Ashwell, 2000;Fathman & Whalley, 1990;Ferris & Roberts, 2001), which, however, also suffered from another design problem. In these studies, evidence for accuracy development was merely based on learners' short-term improved performance in text revision, which sheds no light on whether these improvements would subsequently lead to the acquisition of correct forms in the long run.…”
Section: Whether Wcf Is Effective?mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A major reason we identified for this is that the previous studies differed in how they measured the efficacy of written CF (Sheen, 2007). Some studies have measured improvement only by examining learner's revised texts (Ashwell, 2000;Fathman & Whalley, 1990;Ferris, 2006;Ferris & Roberts, 2001;Truscott & Hsu, 2008). Their findings confirm that "correction does help students reduce their errors on the writing on which they receive the corrections, and that the effect is substantial" (Truscott & Hsu, 2008, p. 299).…”
Section: The Effectiveness Of Written Cfmentioning
confidence: 96%