2020
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Screening, Infection, and Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea in Pregnancy

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with not being tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea infection during pregnancy and for testing positive and to describe patterns of treatment and tests of reinfection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered at an urban teaching hospital from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018. Women with at least one prenatal care or triage visit were included. The index delivery… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
17
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
17
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our results could reflect a delay in treatment, which was not recorded, rather than no treatment at all. In similar studies, ~ 30% of records did not have documented treatments for perinatal STIs 18 , 27 . Goggins et al 27 , examined treatment delays reporting that over 50% of patients experienced delayed STI treatment during pregnancy, with an overall range of 0–221 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, our results could reflect a delay in treatment, which was not recorded, rather than no treatment at all. In similar studies, ~ 30% of records did not have documented treatments for perinatal STIs 18 , 27 . Goggins et al 27 , examined treatment delays reporting that over 50% of patients experienced delayed STI treatment during pregnancy, with an overall range of 0–221 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In similar studies, ~ 30% of records did not have documented treatments for perinatal STIs 18 , 27 . Goggins et al 27 , examined treatment delays reporting that over 50% of patients experienced delayed STI treatment during pregnancy, with an overall range of 0–221 days. These delays were primarily due to lack of clinician recognition of positive results and difficulty contacting patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our clinical setting, an urban, safety-net hospital, is ideal for understanding the impact of time to chlamydia and gonorrhea treatment in pregnancy, as our hospital cares for predominantly underserved women at high risk for both sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and preterm birth. Patterns of positivity, treatment, and reinfection in this population have been described previously 16 ; however, the impact of the frequent treatment delays on outcomes remains unknown. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether time to treatment of chlamydia and gonorrhea in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of preterm and early preterm births.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, an earlier analysis of these data found a majority of treatment delays (65%) were due to health care provider recognition and follow-up, which is unlikely to be differential by outcome, and that rates of positive test of reinfection were low. 16 Second, we used the date of a positive test result to determine time to treatment, and it is therefore impossible to know the duration of infection before testing. However, time to treatment from a positive test is the more clinically relevant measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Enthusiasm for EPT stems from its potential to effectively reach underscreened groups, particularly those who are uninsured or underinsured or who live in medically underserved areas. 6 However, EPT implementation has been suboptimal. In 1 study, about 70% of obstetricians and gynecologists and 72% of emergency room health providers surveyed reported never offering EPT to STI patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%