Early ambulation is a key component to postoperative recovery; however, measuring steps taken is often inconsistent and nonstandardized. This study aimed to determine whether an activity tracker with alarms would increase postoperative ambulation in patients after elective colorectal procedures. Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either trackers with 5 daily alarms or activity trackers alone. Over 223 total patient days, the trackers recorded a complete data set for 216 patient days (96.9%). Increasing the postoperative day significantly affected the number of steps taken, while age, sex, Risk Analysis Index score, and approach (laparoscopic versus open) did not show a significant effect. The mean steps per day in the intervention group were 1468 (median 495; interquartile range (IQR) 1345) and in the control group was 1645 (median 1014; IQR 2498). The use of trackers with alarms did not significantly affect the number of daily steps compared to trackers alone (ANOVA, P = .93). Although activity trackers with alarms did not increase postoperative ambulation compared with trackers with no alarms, we demonstrated a strategy to operationalize the use of trackers into postoperative care to provide a quantitative value for ambulation. This enables quantification of a key component in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with not being tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea infection during pregnancy and for testing positive and to describe patterns of treatment and tests of reinfection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered at an urban teaching hospital from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018. Women with at least one prenatal care or triage visit were included. The index delivery was included for women with multiple deliveries. We used logistic regression to analyze factors associated with not being tested and for testing positive for these infections in pregnancy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine factors associated with time to treatment and tests of reinfection. We reviewed medical records to determine reasons for delays in treatment longer than 1 week. RESULTS: Among 3,265 eligible deliveries, 3,177 (97%) women were tested during pregnancy. Of these, 370 (12%) tested positive (287 chlamydia, 35 gonorrhea, 48 both), and 15% had repeat infections. Prenatal care adequacy and insurance status were risk factors for not being tested. Age, race and ethnicity, alcohol use, and sexually transmitted infection history were associated with testing positive. Time to treatment ranged from 0 to 221 days, with the majority (55%) of patients experiencing delays of more than 1 week. Common reasons for delays included lack of clinician recognition and follow-up of abnormal results (65%) and difficulty contacting the patient (33%). CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors are associated with increased risk of infection during pregnancy. Prenatal care adequacy and insurance status were associated with the likelihood of being tested. Delays in treatment and tests of reinfection were common. Point-of-care testing and expedited partner therapy should be explored as ways to improve the management of these infections in pregnancy.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with testing for and diagnosis of trichomoniasis in pregnancy and to describe patterns of treatment and tests of reinfection or persistence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered from July 2016 to June 2018 at one institution. Testing for Trichomonas vaginalis infection was done by wet mount microscopy or by nucleic acid amplification testing for routine prenatal testing or symptomatic visits. Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with testing for trichomoniasis and testing positive in pregnancy. Treatment and re-testing patterns also were assessed. RESULTS: Among 3,265 pregnant women, 2,489 (76%) were tested for T vaginalis infection. Of the total sample, 1,808 (55%) were tested by wet mount microscopy, 1,661 (51%) by nucleic acid amplification testing, and 980 (30%) by both modalities. The sensitivity for microscopy compared with nucleic acid amplification testing was 26%, with a specificity of 99%. Factors associated with increased likelihood of being tested included younger age (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.99–1.00) and bacterial vaginosis (aRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01–1.37). Prevalence of trichomoniasis was 15% among those tested by any modality (wet mount or nucleic acid amplification testing). Risk factors for trichomoniasis included younger age (aRR 0.97, P<.01), being of black race (aRR 2.62, P<.01), abnormal vaginal discharge (aRR 1.45, P<.01), and chlamydia during the current pregnancy (aRR 1.70, P<.01). Women diagnosed by microscopy had a shorter time to treatment compared with those diagnosed by nucleic acid amplification testing. Most (75%) women with positive infections had a test of reinfection; 29% of these were positive. Bacterial vaginosis was associated with decreased risk of a positive test of reinfection. CONCLUSION: Although testing for and treatment of trichomoniasis during pregnancy is not routinely recommended, the high burden of infection among some pregnant women demonstrates a need to further understand patterns of T vaginalis testing and infection. Opportunities exist for improving timely treatment of trichomoniasis and test of reinfection.