Patterns of re‐referral to social services: a study of 400 closed cases

Abstract

The last 10 years have seen considerable government focus on effective initial assessment processes in the UK. This has been given added impetus by research that found that more than 97% of referrals are closed without allocation for long‐term work. Yet there is little research on referrals that are closed and no British study of patterns of re‐referral for such children. The current study looks at 400 consecutive referrals to three local authority Social Services Departments in London that were closed rather than being allocated for long‐term work. It investigates how many children were re‐referred in the 27 months after closure and identifies factors statistically associated with re‐referrals. The study found that a third of closed cases were re‐referred (36.5%), with most re‐referrals happening relatively rapidly. A small proportion of families accounted for most re‐referrals: 8.5% of families had 52% of subsequent referrals. There was very wide variation between local authorities in the number of referrals and re‐referrals received. Other factors associated with increased likelihood of a re‐referral were: previous referrals, neglect, parental capacity issues (particularly drug misuse) and parent/child relationship problems. The implications of the findings for practitioners, policy‐makers and researchers are discussed.

Predicting risk of entry into foster care from early childhood experiences: A survival analysis using LONGSCAN data

“…This study confirmed two of the most common prior findings in research examining the relationship between maltreatment and placement in out-of-home care: caregiver alcohol/drug use and depression are significant factors associated with placement of children (English et al, 1999; Forrester, 2007; Hindley, Ramchandani, & Jones, 2006). If the goal is to prevent placements, accessible, affordable and effective interventions must be made available for the families who experience these problems.…”

Predictors of Re-Referral to Child Protective Services

“…For example, in 2005, 16% of Californian children referred for maltreatment were referred a second time within 6 months (Needell et al, 2006). Although the majority of re-referrals are seen soon after the initial report (e.g., Forrester, 2007;; for review, see Hindley, Ramchandani, & Jones, 2006), re-referral rates necessarily increase as the length of the follow-up increases. For example, English, Marshall, and Orme (1999) found a re-referral rate of 28% over a 1.5-year period, whereas Drake, Jonson-Reid, Way, and Chung (2003) found a re-referral rate of nearly 50% over a 4.5-year period, and another study by Drake, Jonson-Reid, and Sapokaite (2006) found a re-referral rate of 62% over a 7.5-year period.…”

Measuring children's needs: how are we doing?

“…However, these have yet to be fully exploited, with the result that there are a lot of needs assessment studies at a local level in children's services but, anecdotally and according to inspection reports, their nature and quality vary considerably (Ward & Rose 2002; Cleaver et al. 2004; Preston‐Shoot & Wigley 2005; Forrester 2007). Further, while these studies tend to be completed with much enthusiasm, the ensuing report often gathers dust on the shelf; there is a gap between measuring need and acting on the results (e.g.…”