1999
DOI: 10.1128/aac.43.10.2510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Macrolide Resistance Determinants among Community-Acquired Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates over a 5-Year Period of Decreased Macrolide Susceptibility Rates

Abstract: Erythromycin resistance rates were found to be increased, from 7.1 in 1993 to 32.8% in 1997, among community-acquired Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from the Siena area of central Italy. Most of the erythromycin-resistant isolates carried ermAM determinants and were also resistant to josamycin and clindamycin, whereas a minority (5.8%) carried mefA determinants and remained susceptible to the latter drugs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In two Belgian studies, 8.5% and 9.1% of pneumococcal isolates were resistant by active efflux [14,15]. In Italy, where the incidence of macrolide resistance in pneumococci has recently increased, only 5.8-10% of erythromycin-resistant pneumococci carried mefE determinants [16,17]. By contrast, in Japan, where some 16-membered macrolides are commercially available, 40% of erythromycin-resistant pneumococci display an M phenotype [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In two Belgian studies, 8.5% and 9.1% of pneumococcal isolates were resistant by active efflux [14,15]. In Italy, where the incidence of macrolide resistance in pneumococci has recently increased, only 5.8-10% of erythromycin-resistant pneumococci carried mefE determinants [16,17]. By contrast, in Japan, where some 16-membered macrolides are commercially available, 40% of erythromycin-resistant pneumococci display an M phenotype [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumption of 14-, 15-and 16-membered macrolides in Normandy is shown in Table 4. In 1997, 16-membered macrolides represented one-third of the total consumption of macrolides in adults and half the consumption in children.…”
Section: Consumption Of Macrolides In the Community Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, low-level resistance to 14-and 15-membered macrolides, and susceptibility to lincosamides and streptogramin B, have been described in S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes (M phenotype) [14,[16][17][18][19]26,27]. This resistance is determined by the presence of the membrane-bound efflux protein, encoded by the mef genes, mef(A) or mef(E) [14,[16][17][18][19]26,27].…”
Section: Macrolide-resistant Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three principal mechanisms are responsible for the acquired erythromycin resistance in streptococci: ribosomal target modification, either enzymatically or by mutation; key ribosomal protein mutations; and active cell-membrane efflux [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The ribosomal target modification is most often due to methylation of the adenine at position 2058 of the domain V of the 23S rRNA [2••,20].…”
Section: Macrolide-resistant Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different determinant, the mefE gene, encodes for the efflux system and confers low-level resistance to macrolides (M-type resistance pattern). There seems to be a wide geographic variation in the macrolide resistance pattern, with the MLSB-type predominating in some areas and the M-type in others [21].…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%