2005
DOI: 10.1080/15710880412331289926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of interaction in construction team meetings

Abstract: Sir John Egan's 1998 report on the construction industry (Construction Task Force 1998) noted its confrontational and adversarial nature. Both the original report and its subsequent endorsement in Accelerating Change (Strategic Forum 2002) called for improved working relationships-so-called 'integration'-within and between both design and construction aspects. In this paper, we report on our observations of on-site team meetings for a major UK project during its construction phase. We attended a series of team… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, weekly site meeting is more of an opportunity for subcontractors to receive instructions rather than make input into the decisions. Foley and Macmillan (2005) found that during a team meeting the input from subcontractors is only 2%. It is no surprise therefore, as shown in Figure 1, the managers rarely allow subcontractors to make input during the decision-making process in the Gibraltar construction industry.…”
Section: Last Planner Thinking In the Gibraltar Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, weekly site meeting is more of an opportunity for subcontractors to receive instructions rather than make input into the decisions. Foley and Macmillan (2005) found that during a team meeting the input from subcontractors is only 2%. It is no surprise therefore, as shown in Figure 1, the managers rarely allow subcontractors to make input during the decision-making process in the Gibraltar construction industry.…”
Section: Last Planner Thinking In the Gibraltar Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different types of design meetings and the name of a meeting type, the project stage, the people present and chairing meetings are known to differ (Foley & Macmillan, 2005). Analyses of the patterns of interaction in meetings have reported on the more dominant parties speaking most in meetings at various project stages (Austin, Steele, Macmillan, Kirby, & Spence, 2001;Foley & Macmillan, 2005;Hugill, 2004) and the informal socio-emotional interaction that accompanies task-based communication in meeting settings (Gorse & Emmitt, 2009). On occasion events that have already happened on a project are recounted as stories at a meeting and a local project history unfolds as a project progresses (Lloyd, 2000).…”
Section: Routine Attention To Design Meetingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Teams are defined as groups of people who have skills that are committed to a common purpose and who hold themselves mutually responsible for its achievement [47]. Ideally, teamwork is when a group of people work together in a way that is coordinated and mutually supportive to achieve goals.…”
Section: Team Building Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%