“…Moreover, t he evidence base wit h regard t o t heir cont ribut ion is inconsist ent : semant ic f luency has been shown t o correlat e wit h only semant ic AM (Eust ache et al , 2004;Moses, Culpin, Lowe, & McWilliam, 2004); wit h only episodic AM (Greene, Hodges, & Baddeley, 1995); wit h bot h semant ic and episodic AM (Sart ori, Snit z, Sorcinelli, & Daum, 2004); or not at all (Ivanoiu, Cooper, Shanks, & Venneri, 2006). Similarly diverse result s have been report ed wit h respect t o phonemic f luency (Greene et al , 1995;Ivanoiu et al , 2006;Moses et al , 2004). Met hodological dif f erences are likely t o explain such inconsist ent result s. For example, most st udies of t he relat ionship bet ween execut ive f unct ion and WM and AM have used t he Aut obiographical Memory Test (AMT; Williams & Broadbent , 1986) which does not allow f or t he measurement of "ment al t ime t ravel" t hat must occur f or t he t ruly episodic reliving of phenomenological det ails (Mat uszewski et al , 2006).…”