Patterns of human social contact and mask wearing in high-risk groups in China

Abstract

Background The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has changed human behavior in areas such as contact patterns and mask-wearing frequency. Exploring human–human contact patterns and mask-wearing habits in high-risk groups is an essential step in fully understanding the transmission of respiratory infection-based diseases. This study had aims to quantify local human–human (H–H) contacts in high-risk groups in representative provinces of China and to explore the occupation-specific assortativity and heterogeneity of social contacts. Methods Delivery workers, medical workers, preschoolers, and students from Qinghai, Shanghai, and Zhejiang were recruited to complete an online questionnaire that queried general information, logged contacts, and assessed the willingness to wear a mask in different settings. The “group contact” was defined as contact with a group at least 20 individuals. The numbers of contacts across different characteristics were assessed and age-specific contact matrices were established. A generalized additive mixed model was used to analyze the associations between the number of individual contacts and several characteristics. The factors influencing the frequency of mask wearing were evaluated with a logistic regression model. Results A total of 611,287 contacts were reported by 15,635 participants. The frequency of daily individual contacts averaged 3.14 (95% confidence interval: 3.13–3.15) people per day, while that of group contacts was 37.90 (95% CI: 37.20–38.70). Skin-to-skin contact and long-duration contact were more likely to occur at home or among family members. Contact matrices of students were the most assortative (all contacts q-index = 0.899, 95% CI: 0.894–0.904). Participants with larger household sizes reported having more contacts. Higher household income per capita was significantly associated with a greater number of contacts among preschoolers (P50,000–99,999 = 0.033) and students (P10,000–29,999 = 0.017). In each of the public places, the frequency of mask wearing was highest for delivery workers. For preschoolers and students with more contacts, the proportion of those who reported always wearing masks was lower (P < 0.05) in schools/workplaces and public transportation than preschoolers and students with fewer contacts. Conclusions Contact screening efforts should be concentrated in the home, school, and workplace after an outbreak of an epidemic, as more than 75% of all contacts, on average, will be found in such places. Efforts should be made to improve the mask-wearing rate and age-specific health promotion measures aimed at reducing transmission for the younger demographic. Age-stratified and occupation-specific social contact research in high-risk groups could help inform policy-making decisions during the post-relaxation period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Graphical Abstract

How are protective behaviors against COVID-19 socially controlled?

“…This hypothesis suggests that people adhere less to close people, consistent with Strickland et al (2022). Also, our results were consistent with Al Naam et al (2021) about lower mask-wearing in social gatherings (likely indoor context), and Zheng et al (2022) about more risky behavior was more likely to occur at home or among family members (likely indoor context). The contexts we selected for this study were not specific enough to determine stimulus control topographies.…”

“…Adherence to protective behaviors was sensitive to social contexts and situations (English & Li, 2021;Zheng et al, 2022). In some situations, people adhered more than in others.…”

Evaluation of Mask-Induced Cardiopulmonary Stress

“…As airborne diseases continue to emerge, mask use is still suggested in public and work spaces as a precautionary measure. In China, mask use remains a highly adopted practice in everyday life . However, studies on the adverse effects of wearing masks yielded inconsistent conclusions due to short duration of intervention .…”

The rapid and efficient strategy for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron transmission control: analysis of outbreaks at the city level

“…The control measures for the COVID-19 outbreak were based on the biological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and intended for long-term application [2,14]. Previous expertise promoted the idea that herd immunity could be achieved as long as the vaccine coverage rate reached a critical value of over 80% [15,16].…”

“…The emergence of new mutant variants, the imbalance of global vaccine distribution, and breakthrough infections in vaccinated populations have brought continuous challenges to the effectiveness of vaccinations, resulting in the inability to form a population-wide persistent immune barrier in the shortterm [19,20]. Non-drug interventions such as social distancing, mask-wearing, cleaning hands, and avoiding crowds remain the main prevention and control measures [14,21]. Studies found that social distancing, including the cancellation of small gatherings and the closure of educational institutions, as well as travel and border restrictions, had the greatest impact on preventing and controlling COVID-19 outbreaks of all existing non-drug interventions [2,18,22].…”