2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of genomic changes with crop domestication and breeding

Abstract: Crop domestication and further breeding improvement have long been important areas of genetics and genomics studies. With the rapid advancing of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, the amount of population genomics data has surged rapidly. Analyses of the mega genomics data have started to uncover a previously unknown pattern of genome-wide changes with crop domestication and breeding. Selection during domestication and breeding drastically reshaped crop genomes, which have ended up with regions of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conservation of these species is a priority because of their importance in breeding programs (Andueza‐Noh et al., 2016; De Ron et al., 2015; Debouck, 2000; Rodriguez et al., 2015; Shi & Lai, 2015; Singh, Singh, & Dutta, 2014). In addition, further work is needed to reinforce knowledge regarding population genetics and the response to ecological or climate changes and to evaluate survival rates (Delgado‐Salinas & Gama‐López, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation of these species is a priority because of their importance in breeding programs (Andueza‐Noh et al., 2016; De Ron et al., 2015; Debouck, 2000; Rodriguez et al., 2015; Shi & Lai, 2015; Singh, Singh, & Dutta, 2014). In addition, further work is needed to reinforce knowledge regarding population genetics and the response to ecological or climate changes and to evaluate survival rates (Delgado‐Salinas & Gama‐López, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been concerted interest in the last few years in the analysis of natural variation in plant species (Hunter et al, 2013;Marroni et al, 2014;Shi and Lai, 2015). Comparative studies of patterns of diversity can provide insights into the major factors that underlie mutational diversity among different plant taxa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obviously advantageous to 388 maximise the chances of finding an association by including as much genetic diversity 389 as possible in a mapping population. In the case of crop plants domestication results in 390 a loss of genetic diversity (Doebley et al, 2006;Shi and Lai, 2015), so there is much to 391 be gained by including field races and wild types in the construction of mapping 392 populations or RILs. The phenotypic data required for QTL mapping requires 393 measurements upon hundreds or thousands of individuals depending on the mapping 394 approach adopted, the precision of the phenotyping procedure compared to the 395 variability of the trait and the heritability of the trait.…”
Section: If Variation For a Quantitative Trait Such As Photosynthetimentioning
confidence: 99%