1971
DOI: 10.1037/h0031988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of family interaction and child-rearing attitudes related to three dimensions of juvenile delinquency.

Abstract: Differences in family interaction patterns and parental attitudes in families with an adolescent son or daughter classified as nondelinquent, neurotic delinquent, psychopatliic delinquent, or social delinquent were investigated. Differences in family interaction and parental attitudes between groups offer evidence against: a unitary concept of delinquency and support for the usefulness of conceptualizing delinquency in terras of configurations of dimensions of delinquent behavior. Behavioral measures of family… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zimmerman and West interpret their results in terms of male dominance and the power relationships between men and women: '... just as male dominance is exhibited through male control of macro-institutions in society, it is also exhibited through control of at least a part of one micro-institution' (Zimmerman and West, 1975: 125). Interruption has traditionally been interpreted as a sign of dominance in the psychological literature (Farina, 1960;Mishler and Waxier, 1968;Hetherington, Stouwie and Ridberg, 1971;Jacob, 1974Jacob, , 1975. But more recently some authors have cautiously suggested that it may not always reflect or signal dominance.…”
Section: Interruption In Conversational Interaction 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zimmerman and West interpret their results in terms of male dominance and the power relationships between men and women: '... just as male dominance is exhibited through male control of macro-institutions in society, it is also exhibited through control of at least a part of one micro-institution' (Zimmerman and West, 1975: 125). Interruption has traditionally been interpreted as a sign of dominance in the psychological literature (Farina, 1960;Mishler and Waxier, 1968;Hetherington, Stouwie and Ridberg, 1971;Jacob, 1974Jacob, , 1975. But more recently some authors have cautiously suggested that it may not always reflect or signal dominance.…”
Section: Interruption In Conversational Interaction 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Record linkage, retrospective, and prospective studies suggest trajectories of negative outcomes for children 5 to 12 years after parental death, including functional impairment compared to nonbereaved youth (3), and up to a 13-fold increased risk for major depression (11). Taken together, the effects of parental death on children strongly confer developmental risk for psychopathology and poor outcomes that extends beyond the period of acute bereavement (12, 13). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter grouping may or may not include the whole family, depending on the cut‐off age, as well as the number of family members. This brings us to the problem involved in comparing families at different developmental stages (Hill [108]). A family of three children whose youngest child is 16 and a family of three children whose oldest child is 16 are not at the same stage of family development, and, for some purposes at least, are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Methodological and Substantive Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%